• GhostsAreShitty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Right? Decades of Linux use, been a Linux admin for half of it. Still reinstall when I’m not happy with the way things are going. It’s just faster.

      • animist@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah fedora screwed up TODAY so I’m just reinstalling

        And running into issues encrypting my swap so wishing I had just tried to solve the problem :p

  • This was me back when I disto hopped. Screwing something up was really just an excuse to try something new.

    Now I’m I’m in a comfortable rut, but after recently having to set up a new machine from scratch NixOS is starting to look tempting.

    • happyhippo@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Opensuse TW cured my distrohopping more than 1 year ago.

      Nix is the only distro that’s tempting me…

      • L'unico Dee@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sorry just test it inside vms, or even install it in a partition that you can then delete. You can even try nix just by installing the package manager

    • Tankton@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I work with linux daily, work in IT. Often I just do this as well. Aint got time and energy to fix something while a reinstall takes a fraction of the time

  • Merulox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    I switch distro once I start feeling that my current installation is too bloated and requires a heavy cleaning

    Which is why I switched to nixos, so that I can’t bloat my system up with packages I eventually forget about

    • Klaymore@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      NixOS is so incredibly stable it’s crazy. Even if my entire computer implodes I can just download my couple config files off github and get exactly the same system on a different computer.

      • copylefty@lemmy.fosshost.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m going to try Nix as my desktop OS. The only thing stopping me up until now is I like running the same OS that I run on servers (Debian). Do you think there’s a good use case for Nix on servers?

        • Klaymore@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah NixOS is great for servers, since you’re able to configure everything through the NixOS configs. Like if you want nginx you just add services.nginx.enable = true and similarly set the different virtualHosts and everything. That way your nginx configuration is stored in the same place as your system configuration, which can all be backed up with Git, and you can see everything running on your system and their configuration by just looking through your NixOS config.

          • copylefty@lemmy.fosshost.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s very interesting. I use ansible to maintain configuring on my Debian services. I guess there’d be no need when running Nix

  • jeansibelius@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    I reinstalled Linux when it crashes, or used Timeshift for years, but at this time I learned totally nothing.

    Then I tried Arch manual installation, and it changes my mind.

  • JasonDJ@vlemmy.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Honesty just make /home a different partition.

    Has saved me so much trouble in changing distros on my laptop.

    I’ve settled pretty well on Fedora at this point but that’ll probably change at some point (mostly because I don’t like Ubuntu much and I work in a mostly RHEL shop)

    • JoshuaQuest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is exactly what I have done on my personal installs. Saves so much time when there is a problem or when you just feel like distro hopping.

  • Emi@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    You give that up that strategy and lean into fixing shit when you put the time in to customize the OS and desktop/window manager experience… at that point you should understand your system well enough to make fixing it easier, and you are also afraid of having to redo some of your customization. That being said, you still should make regular system backups, especially if you are tinkering with the OS experience a lot.

      • Count Regal Inkwell@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not about being afraid.

        Customizing takes time and effort, which I’d rather use like.

        Doing stuff?

        Unless I want to re-customize it to be something else, I’d rather not re-make my entire set-up. I figured out what the relevant files were to how my whole set-up (DE look & behaviour, dotfiles for like fish and nvim) and copied it all to a USB Drive that I just drop onto my home folder whenever I install my OS on a new computer.

        • dmrzl@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yes, but recreation of any customization takes minutes if you use the correct distribution.

          For example my root and home are on a tmpfs and therefore get deleted on every boot. Recreating every file in my system is done every boot, so reinstalling == booting (pretty much, partitioning is still manual).

            • dmrzl@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              https://grahamc.com/blog/erase-your-darlings/

              When you regularly create and destroy a few dozen servers you care about reproducibility of installations and configurations. But even when you only have your home pc your drive can die at any point and you don’t want to figure out again how to fix that weird bug you once had or realize that you missed your docker images in your backup regimen.

              If you nuke my pc from orbit I have it set up again in 10mins. Exactly. Every single file.

      • Emi@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Heavy disagree… why pick between distros when you can build an environment unlike others, that fits your personal needs/wants.

        One of the best parts about Linux is this freedom. If you don’t care about this freedom you should probably just be on windows. If you want something different in your Linux, alter it, don’t distro hop.

        • EuroNutellaMan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Idk. I think this only applies to power users or people who are willing to learn how to do things. If someone doesn’t want that, then distrohopping can be a convenient way to get a system you like more. And of course there’s also those that don’t care at all and just want something that works which shouldn’t stay on windows they should just use Linux Mint imo (there are many distros aimed at them and most are good but I would just recommend Mint csuse if you give them too much choice they won’t bother and stay on windows).

          Basically I would just tell newbies “there’s 3 main distros (Debian/Ubuntu, Arch, Fedora (tho I guess the rpm one could also be openSUSE now given what’s happening with RHEL)), every other one is usually just a version of those 3 with different things preinstalled to make your life easier at the start.”

          • Emi@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            If a noob doesn’t want to get into the weeds but still is interested in say the arch community, I would aim them at Manjaro or a more friendly arch distro… If they want to get into the weeds, any distro + customization.

  • Justas🇱🇹@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    have / on one partition and /home on another, when reinstalling, reformat or reuse / and set the other as /home again. Worked very well when I switched from Ubuntu to Manjaro last week when Ubuntu refused to boot up for me for no obvious reason.

    • TwiddleTwaddle@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I switched to BTRFS recently, but found myself even more fucked when my system stopped working suddenly and I didn’t know how to fix it without reformatting and installing grub again. Actually lost even more than I would have otherwise just because I wasn’t knowledgeable enough to get any form of recovery to work. That first EndeavourOS install didn’t last 2 months sadly.

      • PCChipsM922U@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yep, everyone goes through that the first 2 or 3 installs, until you learn how CoW FSes work. It’s not like anything else and it takes a while to master it, but once you learn how to use it, you don’t reinstall ever again, just roll back snapshots 😉.

    • atomic@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yup. Being able to run my home and root(s) in separate subvolumes, and simply booting into a specific root with a kernel parameter… 😌

    • GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      My favorite part of using Suse was Snapper.

      My least favorite part was needing to use it every time they shipped a kernel update because it broke the Nvidia drivers. Eventually I just pinned my kernel version but it didn’t feel sustainable so I swapped back to Ubuntu, which at least in theory tests against the supported drivers. Ubuntu has its own issues so I’ll probably swap again next time my system needs surgery.

        • Shit@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I agree cow + snapshot is pretty useful. I would just never use btrfs for data I care about. There is a reason no one sane runs it in production. Your computer and data do what you want 😊🙂😊.

            • Shit@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Cool I had no idea. I like zstd from them. I don’t really want to argue if it works for you that’s great. I’ve seen so many problems with corruption that I wouldn’t recommend it. I guess I’ll give it another try in a VM some day. I really tried to move to it before migrating back to zfs land. I do recall the send and receive working pretty flawlessly. Also was a huge fan of duperemove.

              Do you know if it has support for something like zvols yet?

              • PCChipsM922U@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yes, it did have problems a few years ago, especially regarding RAIDs, but it’s improved a lot since then. RAID5 still sucks though 😁… but I read the problem is finally been worked on (haven’t checked code, I read about it in a sub on reddit).

                No, it doesn’t have something like zvol, it has the regular subvolumes (pools in ZFS) and you can assign quotas, the same as in ZFS. But, to represent itself as separate block device, no. And I don’t think this is something that’s planned, though I could be wrong (as I said, I haven’t looked at their git in ages).

  • witx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    I did this without having my distro broken. It was like “oh shiny, let me try this distro”

  • Tired8281@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    When I decided to switch to Fedora, I wanted a safety net. I had a 500GB SSD, so I bought an additional 2TB SSD, so I could make full disk image backups and be able to store 3 of them (I used full disk encryption, so my disk image backups were the full 500GB). And I dutifully made backups, either monthly, before I made a big change, or before a major update. Been doing this for nearly two years now and I haven’t used a single backup image even once. It’s almost disappointing, in a perverse sort of way. I was looking forward to having to learn stuff by fixing things that break, but nothing ever does!