I do. Every lib who listens to npr that I’ve suggest it to loves that podcast now

Doubling down

Because it’s misogynistic. And just because you and a couple other mods don’t think so doesn’t make it so.

Marx also talked about the stages of capitalism into socialism then into communism. So can we just start with the bear and move from there?

Go to the message by yoink you responded to in this thread and then go to the message she was responding to and there you go. If that’s not enough to convince you it’s obvious you have no interest in being open to feedback on this issue.

No one wanted to show up to the genocide rally. Shocking

I’m once again pleading with you to make the up arrow just a big bear. Listen to the people it’s what they want. If you’re tired of seeing bears. I’ll take an owl that gets dirty once you click it as compromise.

But no seriously the people want the bear.

Ableism

Where did I compare them? You’re doing that, not me.

Many users have given you countless examples of how it’s sexist and misogynistic and the mods and admins response is continuously been the community, many of whom are trans and not white, is behaving like cishet white men because the view of these select few mods is different than yours.

It’s gross and toxic behavior. It would be so easy to just listen to your community.

No, just stfu /s

You’re just creating some made up relationship between two things when there is none. Some people disagreed about this, some people disagreed about that. They’re the same.

Using Disabled for a comm name is a shit ton different than using Gossip.

It seems the real difference and what I keep hearing is that it’s the mods choice on the names they choose. If they’re name is steeped in bigotry so what the mods wanted it and who are you the community to go against the mods?

Great username

You can’t make this stuff up folks

The power does exist within the workers. The NLRB if it were to truly be pro labor would be a full extension arm of labor. I find no contradiction in having a federal labor bureaucratic agency that protects the rights of labor. The fact that agency could be used to destroy labor unions should be fought and a fight leftist should show up to.

Rooting on the failure of the NLRB in hopes that it creates the contradictions needed for an uprising of the labor movement is naive. As we currently see in the labor movement when the ruling class threatens workers ability to eat and have a shelter they cave and I don’t think this is simply because institutional powers tell them to. I think there’s plenty of critique for these institutions, but what organizational power do leftists have in the labor movement to move people once there is no NLRB or its power removed so much it becomes meaningless?

Or they will just cease to exist. They will be deemed illegal and everything will become a wildcat strike. This take feels like accelerationist but for labor unions

Regular courts that they also control are far more expensive and will never rule in their favor so no union would waste resources doing it

I remember from the beginning you were an extremely thoughtful and kind person. It was refreshing and always shined through.

This is a bad point to make for change. I reject everything british

Louder, for those in the back