Ok

So the only valid criticisms can come from whoever passes your vaguely defined litmus test of “posting about being pro-Palestine”?

Apathy was too big of a word for you??

Criticizing genocide is pointless if both major candidates support it.

Apathy has paved a basis for genocide throughout history, your view is not novel nor beneficial.

You didn’t make this absurd claim?:

If something affects both sides it’s effectively “a wash” and cancel each other out.

If you are victimized, you believe you then have the right to also victimize “to cancel it out”?

Circling back to the content of this post, which supposes that Harris has no faults, I suggest and support critical thinking.

This meme comes from a narrow frame of mind that imagines great differences between foreign policy (where none actually exist) between “sides” and mindlessly upholds a corrupt two party doctrine.

The idea that democrats are entitled to certain votes emboldened Biden to proclaim African Americans aren’t “black”.

Take a break from mindlessly accepting a toxic status quo. Stop showing establishment Dems that they are entitled to votes no matter how far right they are on policy.

If something affects both sides it’s effectively “a wash” and cancel each other out.

It’s called mental gymnastics to think “two wrongs make a right.”

What’s your awareness level on toxic positivity and the childlike assumption that life must be enjoyable at all times?

How dumb of me to think the election will not significantly change the lives of almost anyone who is suffering in America and beyond.

Ok

You assume correctly! Like you, I am simp-pathetic to upholding the genocidal status quo.

It’d be pretty dumb not to blame anyone except those that nominated Harris, the best and only possible candidate to beat Trump.

It would be outright dimwitted to believe any other course of action exists besides voting to show one’s undying loyalty to career politicians who uphold the beautiful and completely non-toxic American status quo.

Wow! Credit from an admitted prejudiced 'Murican!

Your idea of “winning” is maintaining a status quo of state sponsored genocide with exponentially growing homelessnes.

Those that suffer the most in America will barely register a difference in their lives either way. Meanwhile you pretend a major distinction exists in a corporate duopoly.

Media coverage and social discourse, or a lack thereof, regarding settler violence is stark in America.

It can only be called terrorism if the perpetrators are non-white right?

There’s not a thing you could say to overcome my prejudiced view of you.

Typical white American bigot logic.

Imagine hoping for people you disagree with to “be put in camps” while thinking you’re different and better than fascists.

I hope people like you are the first people put in the camps

The famously least democratic voting system? I am aware.

Google:

First Past the Post (FPTP) is widely regarded as a minimally democratic system. Here are some key reasons:

Lack of Proportionality: FPTP fails to accurately represent the popular vote, often resulting in a mismatch between the number of seats won and the percentage of votes received. This leads to a concentration of power among the largest parties, marginalizing smaller parties and independent candidates.
Wasted Votes: In FPTP systems, many votes are wasted as they do not contribute to the outcome of the election. In the 2024 UK general election, for example, 74% of votes were wasted, meaning that only one in four votes had a decisive impact.
Tactical Voting: FPTP encourages strategic voting, where voters choose a candidate not because they genuinely support them, but because they think they have a better chance of winning. This undermines the principle of democratic choice and leads to a lack of accountability among elected representatives.
Limited Representation: FPTP systems often result in a small number of dominant parties, limiting the representation of diverse voices and perspectives. This can exacerbate existing social and economic inequalities.
Comparative Ranking: According to the Citizen Network’s Global Ranking of Electoral Systems, FPTP is not used by most countries, and even among those that do use it, it is often criticized for its limitations. Many countries have adopted more democratic alternatives, such as Proportional Representation (PR) systems.

In conclusion, while FPTP may seem simple and intuitive, it is widely regarded as a least democratic system due to its lack of proportionality, wasted votes, tactical voting, limited representation, and comparative ranking among electoral systems.