So you want them to break into a secure facility and probably get federal charges instead of some rocks?

Cause these rocks are special rocks to you?

To get a bit more technical, they build images in passes; each becoming more coherent than the last. This gives thsm a boost to understanding understand how ‘things’ relate to one another, knowing them by nothing but that relation. Light + light source being an example, and the angle of lighting being another deeper layer of that a - completed on a less noisy pass.

This is how its able to build images from its training parts, it sorta understands how each of them relate to some things, so its able to sorta organizes an image of random noise each pass, eventually creating a ‘unique’ image inspired by its training data.

It also gives it that perfect image you mention, cause its specifically trained to look like what looks good to us - its essentially a function optimised on nothing but.

Makes sense, but at least this would generally be out of a normal users usage case (multi-file documents), and so the power user could probably just open flatseal.

For things like bookmarks it’d work fine, and by extension make the sandbox more secure

I’m not 100% confident but I thought you could use portals to access individual files outside of the sandbox

Zero change is pretty damn impressive confidence intervals, and oil refineries are much easier to cover things up/rewrite the story at

They mention using it in HR to enhance employee retention, which is… pretty damn dystopian

Really wonder why its a multi billion dollar industry just operating off the kindness of landlords, you think they would have pulled out by now with their massive intelligence.

Best of luck when earth is slightly less viable for crops and a couple billion starve.

But no we can temporarily not kill 4 or 5 people so we must be unkillable from anything

Yeah but protesting has a lot better odds at improving that future than Stonehenge I’d argud

I mean its not the exact same crisp but a small layer of oil in a standard pan’ll still beat waiting months I’d argue

I guess thats a good example, when have I claimed to have a solution?

Im just saying they have a monopoly, but if I could scale up to YouTube size economically, I’d probably be doing it instead of arguing about it online

First off this is Canada.

Second off I’m not the other commenter nor know shit about cars so the first point is really all I got

Learn Godot game engine, free and fun to just mess around with a physics engine too your PC melts

Cause a lot of people care more about feeling comfortable than feeling statistically probable.

Is it not common just to make something when you want it?

Maybe I’m too Canadian to understand but do you usually go out for meals?

Same as Walmart killing off every ma and pa shop is their fault, they lowbid the competition solely because they’re able to with their monopolization, solution being actual competition in the industry.

Can’t help but feel your goal posts are sentient with how much they’re moving.

The cost of server upkeep alone

Video content? YouTube’s made it all but impossible to compete with their free offerings, for the cost of server upkeep alone

Sounds like the monopolized industry isn’t right for the users

Plus a little bit of a lack of understanding proof of stake, but your hearts there