You can have a look at Huawei Matebooks just to have a comparison. Matebook 14, maybe, for something that is not outdated.

shahada

MI5 is sitting on the feedback loop wire and amplifying anti-trans stuff.

The people in rural Kazakhstan went from living in yurts and villages to leading highly sophisticated lives employed in communist cadres, arts, theater, mining, gas and oil, mass agriculture and leading a rich and fulfilling civil life… I suppose the popular view in almost every SFSR was extreme optimism for the future to expand man’s footprint in a positive way. I think Destiny 2’s setting is also similar, the Traveler terraformed earth and caused a hastened industrialization, so it makes sense that this rendition of “industry and progress dwarfing man” mimics a setting where something that is basically a god is the literal manifestation of humanity’s extreme progress.

every form of lib activism can be called a psyop since they can all be ridiculed by the media. and some actual based forms of activism can be shown to randoms and they will :chud-rage: anyway

stupud

In 1964, The Militant gained unwanted attention when it was revealed during the Warren Commission that Lee Harvey Oswald had his wife, Marina Oswald Porter take two photographs of him around March 31, 1963 posing in his backyard holding a copy of The Militant and another communist newspaper The Worker in one hand and the rifle that he would later use on November 22 to assassinate John F. Kennedy on the other (he held them in different hands in both photographs). These photographs were considered important evidence in the investigation as it proved the rifle was his. In the 1970s, another photograph of the same was found and was used in a later investigation in 1977.

do you guys think the trotskyist newspaper that published many of trotsky’s works (in english only??? how does a russian writer have texts that are in english but not russian) is a CIA front that brainwashed lee harvey oswald

damn the other photo is “top of the week” material??

https://tlgrm.ru/channels/@proofzzz/22810

"So, Kim, here’s the story… We are going hunting with Shoigu, and uncle Lukashenko is sitting in the back. I was driving then, like I am now.

I look at the road… and see Biden running-crossing it. I veer to the left, and he goes the left. I go right, and he’s to the right! We just barely missed each other! Suddenly I hear a pop from behind. And uncle Luka says to me: Vladimir Vladimirovich, if I hadn’t opened the door, Biden would have gotten away!"

The alternative was Fatah. Interesting to see the results of the polls in the West Bank vs Gaza breakdown (in this specific one it’s from page 4 onward).

It’s probably just a mock-up, due to the unavailability of most car parts.

Yes, there is a long Russian tradition in this, I am thinking of the Potemkin village.

Looks like an intelligent conversation

馬鹿ばか • (baka)
1 foolish, idiotic, stupid, ridiculous

The characters 馬鹿 (literally “horse + deer”) are ateji (当て字), probably chosen as an allusion to Literary Chinese 指鹿為馬 (“to deliberately misinterpret and invert right and wrong”, literally “to point to a deer and call it a horse”)

only? smh this important news would’ve been a presidential alert if it were Trump in office. biden doesn’t take his job seriously

The first chapter about the multiplied agricultural output in Conquest of Bread is argument enough for the silly position.

Anyone think this is weird. American liberals seem to start to care about these issues (that are inherent) with their justice system (and to be honest, their entire country) only when it’s a black guy getting coverage by MSM. Could be entirely my feed/fyp but this guy Clarence Thomas seems to get proportionally more coverage than Alito or the other ones whose names I can’t be even assed to care about, and it’s just complaints about a very basic issue that should have been obvious under Saint RBG, and also applies to the insider trading in congress.

(Figure 1: Simple Area chart)

After doing the math (below) and calculating the absolute values ONLY by using what was provided in the graph by OurWorldInData (pixel counting), I can get the above graph. I used a simple area chart for Figure 1 because it’s close in content and character to what they posted. The reason the left side of Figure 1 appears proportionally different to theirs is because their Y-axis is %, mine is an absolute value. The world population Changed which is not captured in their graph, but is captured in mine. A “simple” area chart is effectively a line chart, as each individual point is with reference to 0, and is therefore it is not suitable to showcase a relationship of each individual part to a whole over time.

Figure 1 can also be represented as Figure 2 simply by subtracting the two quantities to calculate for “Only China” and switching to a stacked area chart. A stacked area chart is what is used in the OP, and it is used to show relationships between two different quantities and also their relationship to the whole over time. On the contrary, a line chart/“simple” area chart is better used to look at different quantities in isolation.

(Figure 2: Stacked Area chart)

So, using ONLY their graph, and converting it to absolute values, we get basically the same graph as in the OP (only with 2 points over time instead of however many there are in the full dataset).

In effect, they’re using two clever tricks in the OurWorldInData graph - one trick is that they calculate from the perspective of World and World-minus-China and use a line chart two draw an equivalence between them. Another trick is that they use Share of Population (%) as the Y-axis, which is inherently problematic for comparisons, as (a) the world population changed (b) the chinese population stayed basically the same. This means that although the share might decrease, the absolute value (the raw number of people in extreme poverty) may stay the same (or even increase! though it didn’t), and finally © it’s easier for people to conceptualize an absolute count of individuals who were lifted out of poverty rather than thinking of percentages of population.

Their conclusion is that China was not solely responsible for poverty alleviation. No shit. Even the OP says China accounts “only” for 75% of world poverty alleviation, and uses $1.90 as benchmark for extreme poverty whereas this uses $2.15. If we do the math, using their benchmark and their data, China accounted for 62% of poverty alleviation.

For a website called OurWorldInData, they sure can’t represent data for shit.

they’re big particles to me, damnit

Mention any projects, programmes, self-learning you’ve participated in (inflate the importance of these somewhat) to at least break it up. Now, assuming that you’ve broken up the big gap into smaller gaps, write a simple and straightforward explanation about your situation at the end talking about all the gaps in general. Just write what you wrote here about the job market but more professionally. Don’t overthink it, some random professor will most likely spend 2-3 minutes looking at it. If you’re applying to some mid uni (I mean any uni that isn’t a cutthroat uni in the US or UK) and your bachelor’s GPA was like 3.2ish+ then you’ll be fine. You’ll just be in the middle of the batch, and depending on how many students applied that semester you’ll have an alright chance at the least.

One thousand pack is $3.326 ($3.325 if you buy more than 1000x One thousand packs) and here’s a $1 first purchase coupon

!! Breaking News !! Redditors have analyzed the body language of President Putin and General Secretary Kim and have determined that Mr. Kim is the man in the relationship.