Aode (He/They)

doing some rust dev

  • 1 Post
  • 20 Comments
Joined 4 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 29th, 2020

help-circle




  • I’m not against including an ipfs layer in pict-rs, but the complexity would go way up. Federating an image between lemmy servers would require sending the ipfs uri between servers via activitypub, and then each receiving server sending that uri to pict-rs. pict-rs would then need to decide, on each server, if the ipfs-stored image matches that servers’ image requirements (max filesize, max dimensions, etc), and if it does, then that pict-rs server would request to pin the image. I don’t know exactly how ipfs pinning works, but ideally it would only be stored locally if it isn’t already stored in at least N other locations. If the remote image doesn’t match the local server’s configuration, it could either be rejected or downloaded & processed (resized etc).

    Serving ipfs-stored images that aren’t replicated locally might also be slow, but I won’t know for sure unless I actually try building this out.


  • I can only say “when it’s ready.” I think most of what I want to include in 0.4 is there, but I don’t have a ton of time to work on it currently. I might see if I can get my last feature changes in this weekend, then it will be a matter of ensuring the 0.3 -> 0.4 upgrade is smooth, and that storage migration is solid


  • pict-rs doesn’t keep track of how often it serves different images, so there’s not a good metric for pruning old images. That said, 0.4 will introduce functionality for cleaning up processed images (e.g. resizes/thumbnails), removing their files & metadata. If they are viewed again, they will be re-generated.

    0.4 will also include the ability to scale down images on upload, rather than storing the original resolution. This is not yet implemented, but it’s on my roadmap.

    All this said, it is already possible to use pict-rs with object storage (s3-compatible), rather than block storage. That’s a good option if your hosting provider offers it









  • With these examples I think the correlation is a little loose. Dr Lutchmedial died two weeks after his third shot. Claiming the vaccine was a direct cause when the only available evidence is a two week timespan is weak.

    The other example provided doesn’t demonstrate harm caused by a vaccine. It sucks that a deadly virus is deadly, and it sucks that the vaccine didn’t help in this case. It’s not a good argument against getting a vaccine.