At the risk of more downvotes, all I was saying is that blanketing a whole group of people in a term such as “deplorables” is a slippery slope to not seeing them as human at all. Not saying they don’t deserve to be described that way.
Don’t need to dehumanize them to describe how much they suck
They might prefer other methods of “executing” justice
But I thought his social media was the best social media… Why would he need tiktok?
Multiple adults are tried and convicted for different roles in the same crimes all the time.
Projecting as usual, are we?
Who needs the environment when we can get dank memes via the Arctic ice sheets
Finally, one of the war crimes might amount to war crimes!
Gotta get em hooked on chromium while they’re young. It’s all about market share, people
No one wants to be a bad consumer
No it’s okay. The front is really light
I’ve been loving Blazor and it totally counts! I’m using it in a hobby project to make mini-games using canvas and integrating with PlayFab (kinda like neopets). It feels so nice to work with and can be so powerful and surprisingly flexible. Angular feels so verbose and unnecessarily bloated any time I even look at my colleagues’ code now 😅
I understand that its a term people use to describe others and that its been used in recent history for these exact people but that doesn’t make it not dehumanizing. My point is just that there should be “people” following “deplorable.” Maybe I was caught up in the semantics of the phrase but it was on my mind seeing garbage people changed to simply deplorables.