Removed by mod
Oi sonny Jim this isn’t a loisense request this is a loisense request request it’s a different department Oi hope you’ve got all yer paperwerk in order jimbo
Oi sunny boy u got a loisense for that loisense?!
Welcome to the uk did you pick up your complementary kettle on the way in? Sorry the rail network is such a mess but what can you do. Glad to have you bud o7
And nazis don’t forget the nazis
It’s the oath of the Horatii and asterix - both well known for being reliable historical sources
Brown nose, brown shirt, the one tends to follow the other doesn’t it
There’s only one gender and it’s mine
I love how tintin doesn’t even have the time to start his sentence with ‘captain it’s the….’
Good point I don’t think he has any interests at all what an enormous red flag
I don’t understand the enormous resistance to the extremely simple idea that obviously evil people obviously and literally rigged an election by literally adding new fake votes, a method so obvious and literal and with such pedigree and history that it has a name, which is ballot stuffing.
Which means that he’s just fine with people thinking that he’s a nazi
The most enthusiastic zeig heil since nineteen forty five
Yeah pretty sure there have been logistically challenging dumps that lasted longer tbh
This should be front page news why is this not front page news what the fuck
(Note that this statement is rhetorical)
I will say that although obviously my opinion doesn’t matter (I’m just some guy on the internet, right), I think that it is deeply counter productive to ban the use of a word a) so completely innocuous and b) in all circumstances regardless of context. We must try not to be dogmatists, after all. The useage of the word is very important is it not. One would not ban a person for saying the word ‘nazi’, for example, (and here is the really important bit) in most contexts. If the person were to make a statement that suggests beyond reasonable doubt that they support nazi actions, then we could probably reasonably suggest that they receive a ban. In such a case they have demonstrated opinions that fall beyond the contract in which we engage by using a forum like this one.
Similarly: consider my useage of the banned word above. Ask yourself not if it was offensive, because offense unless deeply intentional is subjective. Ask yourself instead if the useage was malicious. Ask yourself if it demonstrated an intent to breach the social contract. Consider this. And consider the value of enforcing arbitrary rules in a dogmatic sense, which is to say in a thoughtless sense, without consideration beyond the plain text. Ask yourself how best you can serve your community, and how you can serve those who try to make use of it. Remember that we are all of us here united in our interest in free and authentic (social) media, away from the propaganda and talking points that have become commonplace elsewhere. We make genuine attempts to communicate, and banning any useage of a single word regardless of content is extremely silly.