How will you write with a card? And who will you send the pen ink to?
So many questions
How will you write with a card? And who will you send the pen ink to?
So many questions
I understand, I think. A fundamentally different appreciation of the world that makes me feel alien to many others. You can explain others, but they glass eye stare, as you rarely share the same axioms.
It’s not that I want to have their problems; I just want us to have the same problems.
You’re partially in luck: there are others that share this problem. I hope rainforest mind is still on your to-read list.
What’s wrong with the platforms you’ve tried?
I just wish I was like everyone else.
I deal with that by contemplating the ‘normal’ life. They’ve their own problems. I’d be substituting mine for theirs. And a lot of things that come easy for me, seem insurmountable for them.
Closest to an answer to the question from the title the interviewee gives
But whatever social media companies end up using, it’s going to be balanced against privacy, and it must ensure it does not undermine a user’s security.
I’ve the same issue with images hosted on mander.xyz
How does the first exclude the second? That’s like saying: how can I trust train travel if F1 cars drive 300km/h. They’re different things.
Value investing is basically dead, isn’t it?
You’re looking at a too short time frame. The famous tulip bubble lasted for a decade, too.
I guess the issues arise if Tesla just pockets the subsidy without passing on the savings to savings to people buying EVs
This report shows that they do just that: without the emissions credit system they would operate at a loss. In other words: they sell cars for cheaper than the cost of manufacturing. Coincidentally the same thing the US and EU claims China is doing, as motivation for mercantillist tarrifs.
Which means the system isn’t working. Surplus credits should come from improved efficiencies, not excessive allotment.
Total number of credit goes down over time. That mechanism ensures an adapt, die or emigrate pressure for large polluters, and a financial stimulus for small-polluters.
Bill Gates is famously shorting TSLA (1)
Net profits $2.3B. “Poor financial results”. How does one reconcile these two things?
That’s 2.3B USD on a 1.29T USD valuation, or 0.17%.
Valuations should be reflective of expected future profits. Multiples of ×20 yearly profit are possible for risky (tech or biotech usually) companies, with large potential profit. But the ratio is ridiculously off the charts for tesla. If it does not improve, it will have turned out to have been a very wastefull use of capital.
What are some cool projects I need to know about?
Email, usenet
Sharia EU 👍
That’s probably the easiest to read attention and GPT implementation I’ve seen. Congrats to the author.
Lord of the rings