• 0 Posts
  • 1.42K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 11th, 2023

help-circle






  • It’s supposed to be kind of sort of federal(ish) (federalish enough, in theory, to keep Catalonia and Euskadi happy enough that we won’t want to leave). “States” are called autonomías (autonomies) and have their own government, laws, and institutions, though they still have to obey the Spanish government and most of its laws. It isn’t really working.

    The article is still wrong when it uses “feds”, though, because the cops doing this are the mossos d’esquadra, the Catalan autonomic police, not the “federal(ish)” policía nacional (the Spanish police proper) or guardia civil (despite the name, the military Spanish police, a relic from Franco’s dictatorship, like most of the country and its institutions).


  • It’s supposed to be kind of sort of federal(ish) (federalish enough, in theory, to keep Catalonia and Euskadi happy enough that we won’t want to leave). “States” are called autonomías (autonomies) and have their own government, laws, and institutions, though they still have to obey the Spanish government and most of its laws. It isn’t really working.

    The article is still wrong when it uses “feds”, though, because the cops doing this are the mossos d’esquadra, the Catalan autonomic police, not the “federal(ish)” policía nacional (the Spanish police proper) or guardia civil (despite the name, the military Spanish police, a relic from Franco’s dictatorship, like most of the country and its institutions).



  • leftzero@lemmynsfw.comtoScience MemesBring them back!!!
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Bird skeletons (or simply plucked birds) are seriously disturbing.

    It’s incredible how much work feathers do when it comes to bird appearance.

    Owls are cute and fluffy. Plucked owls are horrific alien nightmares from the outer dimensions.

    Makes one wonder.

    T-Borb


  • leftzero@lemmynsfw.comtoScience MemesBring them back!!!
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 days ago

    if dinosaurs are similar in breathing to humans

    Current living dinosaurs are much more efficient at extracting oxygen from air than practically anything else in the planet.

    Birds’ve got a unidirectional respiratory system that ensures oxygenated air is constantly flowing through their lungs (unlike, for instance, us mammals, who must empty our lungs of spent air before we can fill them again), and a system of air sacs to keep the air constantly flowing.

    While fossil records of the earliest dinosaurs show no evidence of air sacs, later ones do, suggesting that bird-like respiratory systems evolved multiple times in parallel in different branches.

    Sauropods in particular might have had even more complex air sac systems than modern birds, which could explain how they managed to grow so large (i.e., they were full of air, and might have been even more efficient when it comes to breathing, though their long necks might have offset the balance in the opposite direction).

    Dinosaurs would have been perfectly fine with current oxygen levels.






  • The thing about LLMs is that they “store” information about the shape of their training models, not about the information contained therein. That information is lost.

    A LLM will produce text that looks like the texts it was trained with, but it only can only reproduce any information contained in them if it’s common enough in its training data to statistically affect their shape, and even then it has a chance to get it wrong, since it has no way to check its output for fact accuracy.

    Add to that that most models are pre-prompted to sound confident, helpful, and subservient (the companies’ main goal not being to provide information, but to get their customers hooked on their product and coming back for more), and you get the perfect scammers and yes-men. Auto-complete mentalists that will give you as much confident sounding information shaped nonsense as you want, doing their best to agree with you and confirm any biases you might have, with complete disregard for accuracy, truth, or the effects your trust in their output might have (which makes them extremely dangerous and addictive for suggestible or intellectually or emotionally vulnerable users).



  • Thinking back on it, we had book stores back then, so people could have gotten encyclopedias from there, so how did encyclopedia salesmen make any sales??

    If I recall correctly you couldn’t buy the big encyclopaedias in bookstores (dictionaries and single book encyclopedias, sure, but not the big multiple volume ones), only through their sellers or by phone.

    And they often came with a subscription to get new update appendixes and the like.

    (Also most of these door to door salespeople probably also carried other products, like subscriptions to magazines and whatnot; and, an average encyclopedia being at least ten volumes, going up to twenty or so, they weren’t cheap, so they didn’t need that many sales.)