• 9 Posts
  • 506 Comments
Joined 3 months ago
cake
Cake day: August 22nd, 2024

help-circle

  • I’m just gonna post any findings I do notice as a comment as not to mislead in the original post.

    1. https://medicalxpress.com/news/2024-11-reveals-covid-vaccine-safety-patients.html

    So the one thing I see a lot of skeptic accounts mention is “blood clots” and heart/circulatory issues following vaccination, which the study mentioned in this article directly addresses. From what I can tell from this analysis, however, is that: yes the risk of “thrombo-embolic events” does increase post-vaccine,but only if you were already suffering or at risk of atrial fibrillation/flutter. Furthermore, this increased risk was only if at-risk patients weren’t given anti-coagulant medications post-vaccine.

    The IRR across the whole population was 0.93 (Which I’m taking to mean more-or-less no difference in risk?) whereas for the untreated, at-risk group was 1.88.

    1. https://www.salon.com/2024/02/23/major-vaccine-study-finds-heart-risks-are-rare--and-the-real-is-being-unvaccinated/

    So personally I don’t think these articles are as helpful because it has more opinion to it, but then I’m still personally too layman to understand the source material either. Then again, I’m only mentioning it here because Salon has some actual journalistic integrity from what I gather, unlike the Daily Mail.

    This one covers claims of myocarditis and Guillian-barre syndrome, and points out that these “side effects” are also present in… getting COVID. I’m well aware that COVID and long-COVID are strongly linked to heart/circulation issues so it also makes sense if the vaccine had these rare side effects - no different to getting a snotty nose and a headache after a flu shot.

    1. https://pennstatehealthnews.org/2022/09/covid-19-infection-causes-myocarditis/#%3A~%3Atext=The+researchers+compared+patients+with%2Cdid+not+contract+the+virus.

    This link is one of the papers mentioned in the Salon article, about the risk of myocarditis being 7 times more likely from COVID infections over vaccination. Honestly this is more helpful for me to digest; It’s good enough to look at “X times in Y doses, Z sometimes happens” but that isn’t the dice roll I’m making - the game of chance is what side effects of infection am I risking that would be avoided/mitigated by vaccination which might be a good in-road with my FIL.


















  • Then not even sell the damn things

    Sorta true. Nintendo has been monetizing emulation for years, ever since they started releasing “virtual console” games on the Wii web shop.

    The Switch now offers NES/SNES games as a benefit of their online service, and has released a handful of games as standalone releases which are literally just nicely-packaged emulators (Mario Sunshine and Galaxy 1/2 bundle for example)

    If emulation and “piracy” of old consoles is allowed, then Nintendo fears it won’t be able to charge as much to repackage identical technology as full-price game releases.


  • Software parents, specifically game mechanic parents, are fucking insane. You should see the stuff Square Enix has patented following death stranding.

    I get the whole “they just reskinned my game mechanics!!!” but also: I don’t. It’s like saying Go, Draughts, Chess, etc. are copies or “infringing” on one another for being a board game set on a grid with black/white pieces.

    Even the idea of intellectual property is shaky for me but at least it’s more clear cut whether you’ve directly copied or deceived someone with a similar design of a character.