• 5 Posts
  • 869 Comments
Joined 3 months ago
cake
Cake day: December 14th, 2024

help-circle





  • I disagree. War breeds innovation, and while the F-35 is certainly a risk, I am pretty certain they won’t get shut down mid flight. That would be a risk to USA operators too.

    I think having the RAF, who already has the F-35 and experience maintaining and flying them, would be a perfect candidate to see how far the F-35s go before they can’t be flown.

    I still think they need to replace the F-35, but it might also create incentive for the existing owners to re-engineer vulnerable systems for a significantly better outcome.

    Additionally, based on the personalities of fighter pilots I have known, they’d be all sorts of up for this opportunity. If they can get the ability to operate independently of the US, then the rest of the world has Gen V fighters while Russia has none.

    Edit: Additionally BAE is one of the major subcontractors on it. I would suspect they can provide a major benefit to it as well.




  • No. Most blue states have adequate taxation to maintain operations without federal funds, and the federal funds go towards enhancements. Actually I’m pretty certain this won’t affect any blue state beyond a headache of having to rearrange budgets. But I also happen to know that a lot of school districts in my state at least anticipated this happening and have taken measures in advance to keep the education unimpeded.

    Edit: additionally, most blue states only receive funds from the Dept. of Education in the forms of higher education. This will have a lasting impact on academia, but not basic education, which is far more vital.