![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://hexbear.net/pictrs/image/088f6b5e-f4d7-4860-95d9-e1f7728d3dd3.jpeg)
in order for it to be bribery, one of those hands needs to be black
in order for it to be bribery, one of those hands needs to be black
Fortunately Ukraine is a free democracy that will act in the best interests of its foreign shareholders and not an authoritarian dictatorship enslaved to the will of the peasants who live there.
The logical path of progression from here is that “there are no Jews, there are only ‘Israelis’” and "Hitler was right that they were foreigners incompatible with German culture, but his regrettable mistake was not “returning them all to Israel”. From there it’s a simple commitment to ensuring the racial integrity of the “Israeli homeland” by restricting the immigration and citizenship of “Israelis in denial” who are guilty of “autoantisemitism” for not wanting to “go where they belong”.
Personally, I did not find that paying dues to a liberal anticommunist organization for the opportunity to do unpaid labor funneling donations to the Democratic Party was a worthwhile investment of my time, effort, or money. Others experiences may vary.
He doesn’t remember that?
No
Every imperial media outlet would agree that the US blowing up Nord Stream is exactly the sort of “disinformation” that they want to harden their population against. The prevailing concern isn’t the accuracy of the information that a population is presented, the concern is who controls access to that information.
If anything, I think the heightened cultural emphasis on “propaganda” is a byproduct of the consolidation of who is permitted to define “truth” for a population. “Propaganda” is essentially any speech or idea that originates from outside or contradicts the established arbiter of “truth”. Whether or not a thing accurately reflects or conflicts with empirical reality has no bearing on whether it’s considered “propaganda”.
I don’t think “propaganda” is really a useful term anymore, if it ever was, to describe the accuracy or inaccuracy of a piece of information. It only really describes whether the effect that information has is helpful or harmful to a particular ruling class. It’s more a value judgement than a measure of accuracy.
I always assumed that was a deliberate business decision to drive anti-tax sentiment among consumers by charging more than the posted price.
Elon Musk is afraid to go on this sub because of woke
But how are you gonna file your taxes when the IRS starts requiring a Meta account for citizenship verification?
He doesn’t need to convince “the Ukrainian people”: they don’t have a say in their government or their participation in the war. He’d need to convince the Nazis running the military, and the imperial oligarchs who just bought up the country’s assets. Both would sooner see him hanged in the street than allow peaceful coexistence.
I’ll bite: “Hurricane Katrina never happened.”
It’s an byproduct of this site’s podcast fandom origin. Some people don’t understand that Chapo’s “bullying is cool” bit is comedic irony aimed at wealthy journalists and politicians on twitter who never actually experience bullying and just have no context for seeing negative feedback to their broadly unpopular opinions.
It’s also just common regional chauvinism. The same people here who say stuff like “just open a window dipshit, it’s worse where I live and I think it’s comfortable!” will go on to lament the seriousness of climate change elsewhere, then go right on to another post about low temperatures in winter and comment something like “just put on a sweater dipshit, it’s worse where I live and I think it’s comfortable!”
In her interview with that zionist, she had a lot of opportunity to absolutely shred that bullshit
Sure she could’ve, but I’m sure the logic going on in her head was: “If I lose my cool and come off too aggressive, they’ll just fire me and replace me with someone more explicitly Zionist. If I stay calm and professional I can ask questions that prompt the settler to expose her own bigotry to the audience without looking like I’m trying to do a debate instead of an interview. I’ll get to keep using this platform to reach people and ask questions that others wouldn’t.” The joke is that it didn’t matter at all because in the end they just fired her anyway because they didn’t like a black woman’s face while she was being slandered by a bigot.
Maybe I keep wanting to see a new generation of black panthers, instead of someone who doesn’t want to cross the invisible line. Going against the imperial narrative in US media is hazardous to your career, for sure. There’s room for her if she wants to move left, but the forces of capital won’t let her use their media monopoly to undermine their interests.
There’s ideological room for her on “the left” (the limits there being her own class interest and political education), but lets not pretend there’s room for her to have a career “on the left”. The Panthers didn’t organize a 501c4 to pad their resumes. People like BJG desperately want to believe they can turn meaningfully positive political action into a job that pays the bills, and it always ends up like this. To ideologically move beyond the limits of professional reformism, she’d need to accept that it’s almost never going to come with a financially successful career. You can make a living, and you can be a revolutionary, but you can’t make a living being a revolutionary in a capitalist framework. The contradictions will always make you choose one over the other, and a person’s material conditions will usually end up being the deciding factor.
She’s not especially impressive, I just can’t help but pity her being continually hung out to dry in increasingly degrading ways by the systems she keeps trying to work within. A person in her position could live an easy and comfortable life like any other DC suit passively toeing the liberal line. She burns all her bridges with the DNC to be Sanders’ press secretary after they’ve already fucked over Sanders once before, and Sanders turns around and disowns her when she doesn’t endorse Biden. She can’t get work in DC, so she uses some of her only remaining relationships to try to make a living as a podcaster by attaching herself to a Chapo host at the height of their success. The Chapo host gets outed as an alleged sex pest and ghosts her, with the scandal sinking the podcast. She gets a job as a talking head on a DC tabloid rag’s pivot-to-video internet talkshow where they make her interview a settler colonist promoting an ongoing genocide. Gray stays professional throughout the interview, and they fire her anyway, not for anything she said, but because they didn’t like her alleged facial expression after the settler accused her of being a rape apologist.
Obviously she’s a privileged imperial reformist whose politics are nothing special, there’s just something surreal about how disproportionately her career seems to keep getting worse every time she fails to seig heil with enough enthusiasm. If anything, she’s a living morality play for every DSA-adjascent professional “progressive” reformist: you can do everything “the right way” and this is still the best you can expect.
The United States government is admitting to deliberately promoting the spread of COVID-19.
Seems like this woman’s career has just been getting continuously fucked over ever since she decided to work for Bernie Sanders.
Damn, they act like the US murdered a double digit percentage of their population and continues to occupy half their country or something.
Joe Biden correctly believes that US involvement in the western front was about directly securing future Nazi control of Germany from the Soviet Union once it became clear that no amount of private sector US funding and resources would keep the Nazi leadership in power. Joe Biden again wants to secure a weakened, dependent Nazi state in Ukraine from being liberated by Russia.
and yet, here I am. doing just that.