![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://ttrpg.network/pictrs/image/3f8ac09e-5b9a-4afd-b819-e92970b5174f.jpeg)
I wonder if the new excuse any time a media company does something dodgy is “oh it was the AI sorry!”
I haven’t quite finished it yet, my feeling is that it slightly overstays it’s welcome.
I’ve also noticed that most of the time I do a thing or two in the game then realise there’s not quite enough time in the loop to do another thing, but just enough time to make me want to not waste the loop, since I find starting a new loop a bit tedious.
From memory it respawns the low level enemies constantly, since they’re just ammo/health/armour pinatas. You needed to kill the big enemies to complete an arena.
Not really a fan of the design choice, but I had a decent amount of fun when I clicked with how the Devs wanted you to play.
slug
That’s “vindictive and devious baby elephant” to you mate.
It really is shocking how talentless you can be to be a successful right wing talking head.
I convinced my partner to play it recently and the way I knew she’d finished it was that I could hear sniffling from the desk behind me.
It’s hard to cuff someone doing a nazi salute when your right hand is up in the air.
He fucking loves playing this card.
“if you’ve got nothing to hide, you’ve got nothing to fear” was always BS.
None of this is surprising but it’s good to get the names of these people. This sort of shit rambling about elites works in the US and UK, so of course it works here too.
Not from bris but been seeing a psychologist for a while. It may be hard for people to recommed since the way I’ve found it is that I had to see a few before I found one that “clicked” for me.
Have you got a family doctor? They might have a recommendation and they can get you a mental health care plan which will pay for some of your psych appointment for like 10 visits (any doctor can give you the plan afaik).
I don’t even understand much of the basics of how the Australian government works
It’s a meme but if you don’t know how the government works maybe start with Wikipedia: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westminster_system
There’s also boring arse government info: here
Most of this still will probably be pretty dry, but that’s politics for you.
I am completely uninformed and have to vote based off of the miniscule amount of information I have which may not even be correct
To be honest this is probably most people. Even people who think their well informed can be way off the mark also (look at the cookers for instance). The only thing you can do is try get news from a range of sources, be careful to note what is opinion and what is not and try to analyse the source itself. All sources are biased, but some are more well researched or more truthful. Remember also that if you doubt something said in an article you can always cross check with another article, or even do a quick google scholar search (look at a few articles or try and find a review paper - most will tell you what they conclude in the abstract, which you can read for free).
While its true that there are open-access journals and conferences without such costs
To publish open access normally costs upwards of $3k USD as well. There’s practically no point in the publishing chain where academics aren’t getting screwed.
Let’s also not forget that you have to review other people’s papers for the journal for free.
There’s only so many trees, we can beat them!
liberal party
Probably thinks misogyny is okay tbh
Maybe they’re fighting climate change one downvote at a time
The government could do many things, but it’s not the question being asked by the constitutional amendment. It’s not hard to find the design principles for the voice, something I suspect people wouldn’t read even if this wasn’t going to referendum.
Wanting to see something for two years first is kind of an excuse to never do anything. It’s also not really a good argument for voting no, because the idea is that the “shape” of the voice can be changed if it isn’t working. What people are voting on is the concept.
I dunno what else to tell you, that’s the proposal and that’s where we are. If people are voting no because lack of details there’s not much to do to convince them. The government is hardly going to release more details now.
The point of there not being an extremely precise definition of the voice in the constitution is that it can be changed if it’s not working. Most parts of the constitution are like this afaik.
What you are being asked is if you support putting a passage in the constitution that would ensure a body with the express purpose of indigenous representation exists.
Global warming is a hoax, the real threat is global eucalypting