• protist
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    The law in NY defines how much the fines are and how long someone could be held in jail. It would be illegal for the judge to issue a fine larger than what he’s been issuing, which would give Trump a reason to go to a higher court to seek Merchan’s removal, or at the very least delay the case

    • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      The law in NY defines how much the fines are

      So like all fines, they are only a punishment for the poor and middle class.

      and how long someone could be held in jail.

      Sweet, how long is that, and how many times does he have to fuck up before he ends up there for contempt the way I would?

      Edit - pretty sure it’s X + 1 times, where X is always however many times he’s fucked up to date.

      • protist
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        I understand you feel angry, but Merchan has been clear with Trump that jail is on the table moving forward, and I completely respect him not jumping the gun and throwing Trump in jail on a whim. By giving Trump ample opportunities to correct his behavior with warnings of jail time for future violations, he’s setting it up so Trump’s legal team will have no basis to argue Trump didn’t deserve this when they try to remove Merchan from the case or try to appeal

        • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          I understand that but - is jail time not always on the table when you repeatedly ignore orders from a judge in their own courtroom? Does it need to be TEN TIMES to qualify for not jumping the gun? And do you really believe that “next time” he will get jail? (I do not.)

          Meh.

          2 legal systems. That’s what’s on display here. Whether there is justification or not. I don’t fault you for accepting the justification, but this is proof there is one system for the rest of us (which will chew us up and derail our lives over relatively minor infractions), and one system for folks like Trump. (who will die of old age living a 1% lifestyle without ever going to jail, IMO.)

          My frustration is not directed at you, you are just the unfortunate recipient.

          • frezik@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            is jail time not always on the table when you repeatedly ignore orders from a judge in their own courtroom?

            Yes. That’s how NY law on this works.

            The thing that needs to be fixed here is that the initial fine isn’t scaled to the offender’s networth.

            • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              is jail time not always on the table when you repeatedly ignore orders from a judge in their own courtroom?

              Yes. That’s how NY law on this works.

              OK, so if jail is always on the table, and this is the TENTH time he’s been found in contempt, how would it have been “jumping the gun” to jail him after say the 8th time? Or how about the third time? Would I get away with three contempt findings and no jail time under the same judge?

              • frezik@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                7 months ago

                It’s not the tenth time after the first hearing.

                There was one hearing covering several instances. All those get bundled together as a set of $1000 fines each. There was then a second hearing (which is what is being cited in OP), which covered more instances, but they all happened before the first hearing. So it’s a second set of $1000 fines. If there’s contempt hearing for something that happened after the first hearing, then it’s jail time.

                Which is how the system should work for anyone, excepting the size of the fine compared to networth.

                • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Which is how the system should work for anyone

                  I feel really doubtful that it would work that way for me, (or for any rando off the street) but you seem very certain, so that’s probably as far as we can expect this conversation to go. Thanks for the discussion though. :)

                  • frezik@midwest.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    Well, it would work for you, because NY law is very specific about how this works. There isn’t much wiggle room here.

              • ripcord@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                7 months ago

                Its the second time he’s been found in contempt. The first was on 9 counts. In the second the judge is now threatening jail time.