[Idea] If you don’t want to see huge flags taking space over actual drawings in the Canvas, pick the biggest flag that you can find to deface.

As long as a lot of people are doing that, the ones templating larger flags will be forced to reduce their layouts and give more room for actual drawings.


[Reasoning] When it comes to country flags, I think that the immense majority of the users can be split into four groups:

  1. The ones who don’t want to see country flags at all.
  2. The ones who are OK with smaller flags, but don’t want to see larger ones.
  3. The ones who want to see a specific large flag taking a huge chunk of space.
  4. The ones who want to see the whole canvas burning, like the void.

I’m myself firmly rooted into #1, but this idea is a compromise between #1, #2 and #4.

Typically #3 uses numbers (and/or bots) to seize a huge chunk of the canvas to their flags. Well, let’s use numbers against it then. As long as #1, #2 and #4 are trying to wreck the same flag, we win.


[inb4]

But what about identity flags?

Not a problem. They’re typically bands instead of thick squares, and people drawing them are fairly accommodating.

But what about [insert another thing]

Even if [thing] is a problem, it’s probably minor in comparison with huge country flags.

What should be the template?

None. We don’t need one, as long as everyone is working against the same large flag.

Just draw something of your choice over the flag, preferably over its iconic features.

But I’m not creative enough for that!

No matter how shitty your drawing is, it’s probably still way more original than a country flag. So don’t feel discouraged.

That said, you can always help someone else with their drawing. Or plop in some text. Or just void.

Why are you posting this now, you bloody Slowpoke?

I wish that I thought about this before Canvas 2024. But better later than never. (And better early by a year for Canvas 2025.)


EDIT: addressing on general grounds some whining from group #3 (the ones who want to see a specific large flag taking a huge chunk of the canvas space).

You do realise that this sort of “war against the largest flag” should benefit even you, as long as the biggest flag is not the one you’re working with, right? Even for you, this makes the canvas a more even level field. Let us not forget that you love to cover other flags with your own.

  • LvxferreOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Frankly, ditto. And it’s icky for me specially when people conflate country with culture, like those people rather consistently do.

    And… like, I get that we [people in general] get spammed by our governments with ideology, in order to ditch all available identities that we have at our disposal, and adopt the country-based identity that benefits the government. It’s more often than not fuel for oppression.

    • CaptObvious@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Don’t know if you’re familiar with the US Oath of Allegiance that every school kid is forced to recite at the beginning of the day, but it’s literally an oath to a flag. Completely fucked up, IMO.

      • LvxferreOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m aware of the oath of allegiance, and that it’s an oath to a flag. On its own, this sounds ridiculous already - a symbol for another symbol, just like Brazil’s hymn to the flag.

        But being forced to recite it at the start of the day is news for me, and throws the “disgusting” factor up the roof. Even if it was with adults, and not reciting it was only socially awkward, it would be already a clear violation of consent. Swap the adults with kids and have their superiors (the school staff) forcing them to do so, and it gets way worse.

        This also shows really well that a flag is not the symbol of a population, it’s the symbol of a government. Otherwise it wouldn’t make sense to require to have them to pledge allegiance.

        Sadly, I don’t think that the US government is special in this aspect. Governments are like this.

        • CaptObvious@literature.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Agreed on all points. And I’m sure the US is not unique.

          Come to think of it, the national anthem is also about the flag. We have a real fetish for cloth crafting.

          • LvxferreOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            Come to think of it, the national anthem is also about the flag. We have a real fetish for cloth crafting.

            Acc. to a map that I found it’s relatively uncommon, but it does pop up for other governments (mostly Albania, Somalia, Switzerland, Turkey). So… yeah, your power structure does have a fetish for cloth crafting.

            (Most other countries anthems talk about killing, self-references, or worship some individual. In the meantime almost none talks about friendship, and based on this map none seems to acknowledge that the world is not just the territory controlled by its government.)

            • алсааас [she/they]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              There are some progressive battle anthems/hyms or some with a battle theme in a part of them and they still espouse friendship between the working peoples of this world! (though that’s usually the case for (used to be) socialist music) “The Internationale”, Vietnam’s anthem, “Auferstanden aus Ruinen” and ofc USSR’s anthem come to mind

              What I mean to say is that violence can be liberatory instead of oppressive (like in the case of Vietnam)

              • LvxferreOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                What I mean to say is that violence can be liberatory instead of oppressive

                Fair point.