The Free Penguin to [ARCHIVED] Shit Liberals Say@lemmygrad.ml • 1 year ago"We need a mix of private and social ownership of the means of production"lemmygrad.mlimagemessage-square28fedilinkarrow-up161arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up161arrow-down1image"We need a mix of private and social ownership of the means of production"lemmygrad.mlThe Free Penguin to [ARCHIVED] Shit Liberals Say@lemmygrad.ml • 1 year agomessage-square28fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareKaffelinkfedilink24•edit-21 year ago“Mixed economy” in China = building socialism by appropriating bourgeois property, by degree vs “Mixed economy” in the Nordics = state companies for energy and healthcare paid for by taxing private firms
minus-square@DrSankara@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilink4•1 year agoYeah I was wondering how socialism with Chinese characteristics plays into this. Surely this is an example of a mixed economy?
minus-squareDeer Tito (She/Her)linkfedilink7•1 year agoPRC: “Mixed economy” while building a modern socialist society, on the way to achieving communism. The Nordic countries: Thinking mixed economy is the goal, and that it will somehow work for everyone.
minus-square@DrSankara@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilink3•1 year agoThis is a very succinct way to explain it. Thank you
“Mixed economy” in China = building socialism by appropriating bourgeois property, by degree
vs
“Mixed economy” in the Nordics = state companies for energy and healthcare paid for by taxing private firms
Yeah I was wondering how socialism with Chinese characteristics plays into this. Surely this is an example of a mixed economy?
PRC: “Mixed economy” while building a modern socialist society, on the way to achieving communism. The Nordic countries: Thinking mixed economy is the goal, and that it will somehow work for everyone.
This is a very succinct way to explain it. Thank you