Ok, when you look at it like this, what physicists are seeing is the first two 1s and the 3, so seeing 1+1 = 3 in nature, and it obviously looks wrong to you, yeah, you try to figure out why it’s there: either (a) we don’t understand math, or (b) we missed something in the equation. Occam’s Razor says we missed something in the equation. So we add another 1 to make it make sense for now while we look for proof that either (a) or (b) are true.
Ok, when you look at it like this, what physicists are seeing is the first two 1s and the 3, so seeing 1+1 = 3 in nature, and it obviously looks wrong to you, yeah, you try to figure out why it’s there: either (a) we don’t understand math, or (b) we missed something in the equation. Occam’s Razor says we missed something in the equation. So we add another 1 to make it make sense for now while we look for proof that either (a) or (b) are true.
Yes. But this is a joke.
Not entirely; physics still has some value
[oofs in Feynman]
Gottem
1+1+x=3Solve for xSure seems like x is 1
No X in the op though