• iii
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    The government is the alliance that together gets >50% of the votes. That alliance falling through is the same as government (legislative and executive) disbanding.

    Usually this means (1) hand over to a care taker government to have status quo continue (2) no more changes to law.

    Then a few rounds of trying to find a new >50% alliance. After that, if necessary, new elections.

    The reason it works differently in the US is because first-past-the-post voting always results in a 2 party dominance system. US alliances benefit from being formed before election, join blue team or red team. Here it’s after elections, with a lot of different combinations possible.

    • Rooskie91@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 days ago

      Seems like a nice feature to be able to get a new government if the current government refuses to work together.

      In the US, we just end up with years of political deadlock.

      • iii
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        The downside is that it can take a long time to form these alliances. Belgium’s record is almost 2 years (out of a 5 year election cycle).

    • anguo@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Canada has first-past-the-post voting and still resulted in a minority government this year.

      • Mossheart@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        It will probably continue until we look like America’s system. FPTP is just about the dumbest system out there.