Labour plans to axe all hereditary peers from the House of Lords, reports have suggested.

But the 92 hereditary lords who sit in Parliament’s upper chamber would still be allowed to retain their access to the Palace of Westminster as a sweetener, the Financial Times has reported.

This would allow them to still enjoy access to Parliament’s bars and subsidised restaurants.

Labour has previously vowed to abolish the unelected upper chamber of Parliament, with Sir Keir Starmer having branded it “undemocratic”.

  • @RobotToaster
    link
    193 months ago

    And replace it with what?

    A second FPTP psuedo-democracy isn’t going to help.

    • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      233 months ago

      It’s worse than that - they rowed back on fully reforming the House of Lords, this is just binning hereditary peers, all the others get to stay. So it’s the same mess, just with slightly fewer leeches hang off it.

      They have the opportunity to make a sweeping change and show people there’s a different way of doing democracy. They aren’t taking that though.

    • @NotACube@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      113 months ago

      I never thought of it before but your comment just made me realise this would be a great backdoor way to get the PR ball rolling. Make the lord’s elected with a full PR system. Maybe with half the seats going up for election every 7 years or something.

      • @wewbull@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        43 months ago

        I which case it should become the primary chamber. Having the second chamber be more representative of public opinion would be yet another way the commons would repress the views of the people.

      • @gedhrel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        22 months ago

        The issue with this is the same as with the mayoral system. The next tine the Tories get a turn, they replace it with FPTP and claim it’s “more democratic”.

      • @RobotToaster
        link
        13 months ago

        I’m pretty sure I’ve seen that suggested before, it would make a lot of sense, so obviously it will never happen.

    • theinspectorst
      link
      fedilink
      52 months ago

      No, they’re not even proposing to replace the House of Lords here. All they’re proposing is to remove the remaining 92 unelected hereditary peers (out of around 800+ total unelected peers) who survived Blair’s 1999 cull of most hereditary peers.