A judge ordered Planned Parenthood to hand records of transgender care over to Andrew Bailey.

A St. Louis judge has ruled that Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey is entitled to Planned Parenthood’s transgender care records, ordering the nonprofit to turn over some of its most sensitive files to the man who has built his unelected political career on restricting health care access for trans people.

In his Thursday decision, Circuit Judge Michael Stelzer wrote that Bailey can collect documents under Missouri’s consumer protection statute that aren’t protected under federal mandate, namely the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, better known as HIPAA.

“It is clear from the statute that the Defendant has the broad investigative powers when the consumer is in possible need of protection and there is no dispute in this matter,” wrote Stelzer. “Therefore, the Defendant is entitled to some of the requested documents within his [Civil Investigative Demand].”

Bailey, who last year attempted to implement a ban on gender-affirming care for people of all ages, was quick to celebrate the decision, calling it a “big day” for the state.

  • Aviandelight
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    8 months ago

    Technically this is a grey area and they are blatantly misusing the exception for court order/warrant rule. HIPAA just states that records must be turned over but doesn’t get into details concerning how much or how little should be provided. I really can’t believe the judge allowed this but I suspect (hopeful anyway)that this will get kicked up to a federal court since federal law supercedes state laws.

    • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      8 months ago

      There needs to be a stay of enforcement if it’s going to be appealed.

      Though I fully suspect that if it gets to SCOTUS, there isn’t going to be much hope.

      • jkrtn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        Doesn’t that precedent make it possible for medical records covering abortions to be used in the same way? Repubs would never allow that, they have too much to lose by having people find out what they’ve done.

        • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          8 months ago

          Republicans would absolutely allow that. They are willing to bite their own noses off just to spit in their enemies faces.

          How it would play out is selective prosecution where only democrats poor people or non-whites get charged.

          White Christians would get a pass at best. Or blackmailed at worst.

          • jkrtn@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 months ago

            Yeah, true. Their voters have zero integrity or consistency. And their propaganda networks will be pretending that voter fraud is happening as a cover so they’ll never know in the first place.