Gretchen Whitmer responds to calls by some Democrats to vote ‘uncommitted’ in Michigan’s primary on Tuesday

Gretchen Whitmer, the Michigan governor, pushed back on calls to not vote for Joe Biden over his handling of the Israel-Gaza conflict, saying on Sunday that could help Trump get re-elected.

“It’s important not to lose sight of the fact that any vote that’s not cast for Joe Biden supports a second Trump term,” she said on Sunday during an interview on CNN’s State of the Union. “A second Trump term would be devastating. Not just on fundamental rights, not just on our democracy here at home, but also when it comes to foreign policy. This was a man who promoted a Muslim ban.”

Whitmer, who is a co-chair of Biden’s 2024 campaign, also said she wasn’t sure what to expect when it came to the protest vote.

Rashida Tlaib, a Democrat who is the only Palestinian-American serving in Congress, urged Democrats last week to vote “uncommitted” in Michigan’s 27 February primary.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    47
    ·
    9 months ago

    Neoliberals never let a silly thing like facts get in their way.

    They’re just republicans who don’t want the cool kids to hate them.

    The fucked up part is theyre the only other option this election, and they know it.

    It’s not good enough for them that Biden is better than trump, they want 100% support for all the fucked up shit Biden is doing as well.

    • protist
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      they want 100% support for all the fucked up shit Biden is doing as well

      Who are you even talking about?

      • beardown@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Israel’s Genocide that is only possible because of our unwavering political and military support, probably

    • Uranium3006@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      26
      ·
      9 months ago

      And they yell at us for not putting up with their putrid shit. Whatever happened to “push Biden left”

      • a lil bee 🐝@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        You have? Like, it’s been a clear influence in the policies of his administration. I’m my opinion, it would be pretty short sighted to turn that influence into disdain.

        • beardown@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Israel’s extermination of Gazans with our unwavering funding is not a “left” policy

          • a lil bee 🐝@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            And wouldn’t you know it, there’s a lot more to an administration than their stance on Israel. Stop trying to boil everything down to truisms and catchphrases. If you really don’t think that the left has had a sizeable impact on Biden’s admin, we don’t really have a lot to talk about here.

            • beardown@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              The left has had a sizeable impact on Biden’s domestic policies. Including the Inflation Reduction Act, American Rescue Plan, and the Bipartisan infrastructure Law.

              The Biden administration has been funding and arming the Israeli genocide of Gaza

              Both are true. And genocide is the worst thing a country can do. I learned that in 6th grade when we learned about the importance of ensuring “Never Again” re: the Holocaust

              • a lil bee 🐝@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                I just don’t understand the pragmatism here. You sit the election out, Trump wins, Gaza is leveled for a mega church the next week and American democracy is in danger. You sit the election out, Biden wins, he now gives 0 fucks about your leverage in his second term because he doesn’t need it. You vote, Trump wins, Gaza still gets leveled for the mega church. You vote, Biden wins, progressives now have leverage to force Biden into a harsher stance on Israel in his second term, exactly like you’ve been doing already in his first.

                Subtlety and nuance have never been a strength of populist movements, but the left should really examine their impact on Biden’s Israel stance. No, he hasn’t completely blown up our relationship with Israel, but this is the harshest stance America has taken against Israel possibly since its inception. I’m one of the huge percentage who want further action done to bring Israel to heel, but my only realistic avenue to achieve that is by continuing to exact the leverage I have while keeping that leverage intact.

                Frankly, if you want anything more, the left needs to grow and get more powerful. Objectively right now, they are weaker than the major political parties, which is what has forced them into this relationship. If you want a president who is going to give you your deepest wishes with no concessions, you’re going to need to get a hell of a lot stronger. Frankly, because of that lack of pragmatism and political capital, I don’t see it happening in my lifetime.

                • beardown@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  You vote, Biden wins, progressives now have leverage to force Biden into a harsher stance on Israel in his second term

                  I don’t see how voting for a hypothetically successful Biden candidacy would create any leverage on Biden. He is term limited and cannot run for reelection if he wins in November. And even if Kamala/Newsom/Whitmer/etc want to win in 2028, I don’t see how anti-Zionists uniformly voting for Biden in 2024 will have any bearing on their development of policy re:Israel. If anything, voting for him in November despite Israel’s genocide seems to demonstrate that Israel can do whatever it wants, including exterminating the Palestinians, and Dems still won’t meaningfully lose any votes. It’s the same concept as Trump saying he could shoot someone in the middle of the street and not lose any votes - here, it seems that Dems/Biden can do anything including funding and arming a genocide, and, under your hypothetical, they won’t lose any votes. How does that enable anti-Zionists to get leverage? If anything, it encourages establishment politicians to disregard anti-Zionists and take them for granted.

                  Also,

                  Subtlety and nuance have never been a strength of populist movements, but the left should

                  I’m not bothered by this, but this sort of rhetoric is highly unpersuasive and will not cause you to persuade anyone to your point of view, which I assume is your goal. It makes it less likely that people will agree with you when you insult them. Especially when you imply there is something innate about them that prevents them from being as rational as you. It’s othering, and it creates resentment, not changed views

                  • a lil bee 🐝@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    You admit above that progressives have used leverage to have a large influence on the Biden admin. It’s the same principle. Biden makes promises to get elected, which you then hold him to during his term. You did it with student aid (even if the Supreme Court squashed the largest one), you did it with the FTC, you did it with the climate and infrastructure bills. You had to compromise, because of course other people have power and leverage to use, but you got solid returns. You could flip your argument on term limits on its head and say he would be even more unconstrained to pursue the agenda his voters want.

                    Can you answer me on what the alternative does? Trump is not going to be an anti Zionist. He’s going to hurt more Palestinians, harder. He’s going to devastate international relations and create similar crises across the globe, which will hurt even more people. At what point do you take responsibility for those genocides you didn’t help to prevent? At what point do people’s lives override strict principles?

                    I’m sorry, you’re right that I shouldn’t be slinging that sort of thing. On that same token, myself and a lot of others have been called “genocidal” and various other things for the belief that it’s not as simple as Biden just yeeting every ounce of support out of Israel because of the broader context of the middle east.

                    To be clear, I love the left. They are America’s heart and lead with empathy, which is so sorely needed in politics. I just think that the left, as a combined group, lacks pragmatism in favor of principle. That tendency has led to the left not having any true power for a century, and that’s only if you consider FDR a leftist, which a hell of a lot of leftists would not. I need wins. I need rights. The democrats deliver that for me. Not always, but I have multiple rights as a gay woman that I would not have without them. So like, nothing would make me happier than the left infecting and overtaking the democratic party. Please do it! But until then, I think it’s foolish to use the left’s leverage this way. It’s cruel to those you leave behind when you sit at home. It’s cruel to those who will be affected by the genocides that will be started and strengthened by a Trump admin. It’s cruel for the sake of political gamesmanship, which is exactly what the democratic party is accused of constantly.