Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has endorsed President Joe Biden’s reelection campaign, a sign of the president’s strength in uniting his party to have the backing of one of its most liberal members

  • TheBucklessProphet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    For anyone who wasn’t previously convinced that AOC was a simple Dem operative rather than the socialist she was masquerading as, here you go. No serious socialist would back the reelection of an old white dinosaur who broke the rail strike’s back the way Biden did. The fact that DSA didn’t revoke her membership after that is a black mark on them as an organization.

    • BrandoGil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      That point about the rail workers isn’t accurate

      After months of negotiations, the IBEW’s Railroad members at four of the largest U.S. freight carriers finally have what they’ve long sought but that many working people take for granted: paid sick days.

      This is a big deal, said Railroad Department Director Al Russo, because the paid-sick-days issue, which nearly caused a nationwide shutdown of freight rail just before Christmas, had consistently been rejected by the carriers. It was not part of last December’s congressionally implemented update of the national collective bargaining agreement between the freight lines and the IBEW and 11 other railroad-related unions.

      “We’re thankful that the Biden administration played the long game on sick days and stuck with us for months after Congress imposed our updated national agreement,” Russo said. “Without making a big show of it, Joe Biden and members of his administration in the Transportation and Labor departments have been working continuously to get guaranteed paid sick days for all railroad workers.

      “We know that many of our members weren’t happy with our original agreement,” Russo said, “but through it all, we had faith that our friends in the White House and Congress would keep up the pressure on our railroad employers to get us the sick day benefits we deserve. Until we negotiated these new individual agreements with these carriers, an IBEW member who called out sick was not compensated.”

      From https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2023/6/23/2177130/-Big-win-for-Rail-Workers-under-the-Biden-Administration-info-on-the-climate-answer-America-needs

      • blazera@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        IBEW stands for international brotherhood of electrical workers. They have a division of electricians that work on railroads. I dont know why this guy keeps getting quoted as some head of railroad workers. Thats also one of the unions that voted in favor of the contract with no sick days, it was actual rail worker unions opposing it that were planning on striking before Biden decided workers dont get to strike.

        • BrandoGil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I’m aware of who they are, that article just had the easiest quote to pull showing that the admin kept working at it quietly behind the scenes. A better, yet more convoluted article would have been the one I’m linking below that shows the wins so far, the work that still needs to be done, more sources speaking on how their individual unions are doing, and a larger conglomerate of players still helping (the Biden admin is still a player)

          https://www.theguardian.com/business/2023/may/01/railroad-workers-union-win-sick-leave

          • blazera@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            oh good, a minority of rail workers got the right to be sick after Biden outlawed their right to collective bargain

            • BrandoGil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Majority*, more or less the only ones still bargaining are the operators, and I don’t understand your cynicism as the work is still being done. It’s obvious from the results so far that it’s succeeding, just slowly and out of the spotlight.

              • blazera@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                “granted paid sick days to almost half their workforce.” is PR speak for minority.

                My cynicism stems from the fact that collective bargaining was outlawed. Telling unions they’re not allowed to go on strike. That’s real, the president forbade a union to do what unions do, that’s now a precedent we can just call upon whenever workers rights might inconvenience rich people, shit’s not okay. Kind of hard to negotiate when your one point of leverage you have on the rich is not allowed. Any of this ‘work still needing done’ would have been done a whole lot sooner and better if not for Biden.

                • BrandoGil@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Older article

                  WASHINGTON, June 5 (Reuters) - More than 60% of U.S. unionized railroad workers at major railroads are now are covered by new sick leave agreements, a trade group said Monday.

                  https://www.reuters.com/world/us/most-unionized-us-rail-workers-now-have-new-sick-leave-2023-06-05/#:~:text=Under the agreement effective Aug,use as paid sick time.

                  I also disagree with the “better” part and the precedent you think that vote sets, for a few complicated reasons. First, “better” would have included hurting 100% of Americans with even more increased prices than were already being suffered from inflation numbers on the back end of the COVID economy. The administration had to choose between helping the union workers and helping all Americans. In the end, they chose both, just not immediately as illustrated above. As far as the precedent goes, rail unions are in a very unique position as Congress has a permanent seat at the bargaining table, this is not something other unions face. While we’re on precedents, they had already agreed on a contract months before and still moved to strike, that’s also a dangerous precedent. The whole thing was a shit show top to bottom. All things considered, I think the Biden admin is handling it the best that any ever could have.

                  • blazera@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Yeah, you think the labor strikes to get us the 8 hour work day and overtime laws didnt raise prices? This logic you’re using can dismiss any labor movement, because the employers are holding prices hostage. Same logic used against minimum wage, against child labor laws. I cant afford shit and Im willing to afford even less shit temporarily for another industry to get better workers rights. Anything to hurt scumbag employers not even allowing workers to get sick.

                    And no, they didnt agree on a contract months before. Some union leaders agreed to it, others rejected it, no one ratified it, before congress and Biden enforced the agreement by legislation. Why the hell would they strike against a contract they agreed with?

      • TheBucklessProphet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Listen, I’m thrilled that the workers got their sick days and credit where credit’s due to anyone in the admin who helped secure that, but that doesn’t make my point inaccurate. The Biden administration helped deny railroad workers their right to strike. That counts as breaking the back of the strike, even if after breaking their back they turned around and gave them (at least part) of what they were asking for. Breaking strikes via a literal act of Congress is a deeply upsetting, dangerous, and anti-worker move. Full stop.

        In contrast to the IBEW statements you’ve quoted up above, look at the contrasting tone from the RWU in a recent Jacobin article:

        RWU made crystal clear by our words and actions throughout contract negotiations that, while we were of course in full support of seven days of paid sick leave for railworkers, RWU would never be in favor of any legislation denying railroad workers our human right to withhold our labor when all else fails in our struggle for safe working conditions and dignity, regardless of whatever concessions may be dangled.

        RWU was and is in favor of any legislation that would grant any relief to the barbaric working conditions we contend with — but we would never concede our right to strike. We thank Ocasio-Cortez and other members of the House of Representatives and the Senate for their votes in support of sick leave. But we are not happy at all with her or others in both chambers who voted to deny railroad workers the right to strike.

        (Emphasis added by me)

    • frozen@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      What do you want her to do, split the vote? I agree Biden sucks, but shit, he’s at least better than any GOP alternative. The real solution is for the DNC to stop pushing crusty old white fucks.

      • pirategoddess@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This. We can worry about progressive politics in 2028, but right now we have to focus on defeating fascism, and Biden is currently the best candidate for that.

      • MxM111@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Before “splitting the vote” there is democratic primary, where you are supposed to “split the vote” to select the best candidate. Although, my political inclinations are such, that I would chose Biden over her. But I am afraid that if anyone, but Tramp, were to run against Biden, then GOP candidate would win, simply because they are younger.

        • JD Squared@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I know it’s early but who actually has a chance of being the Republican nominee? If anybody I would give the title to RFK jr, but he’s running as a Democrat.

          I don’t see anybody in the field who has the charisma to beat Trump in the primary. And if it turns out he can’t run, I don’t see anybody being able to beat Biden, except ourselves.

          I really don’t want to tell people to stop complaining in threads like these. I do believe we need to push progressive causes and progressive house members and get them to win elections. But if all the people who complain in here don’t show up to vote for Biden, there might not be enough votes to overcome all the degenerates who vote for Trump

      • TheBucklessProphet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        What I want to see is for her and anyone else calling themselves a socialist to work to be a socialist power outside of the Democratic Party. The DNC is rotted to the core by the money and influence of the capitalist class in a way that, if not irreversible, is hopeless in the short to medium term. Just look at all of the explicitly capitalist Democratic leaders, including younger ones like Buttigieg.

        If you want to pursue socialism, the DNC is the wrong place to do it. Hell, looking at history I think putting eggs in the electoralism bucket is fundamentally flawed. Look at the failed German revolution that helped make room for the ascension of the Nazis thanks to “socialists” making extreme compromises and undercutting socialist revolutionaries to instead work within bourgeois political parties.

      • blazera@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The real solution is for the DNC to stop pushing crusty old white fucks.

        the hell do you call this then?

    • Entropywins@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Double check what happened after the breaking of the railstrike… check with the union they have info on their website

      • TheBucklessProphet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I thought I replied to this message, but it doesn’t appear to have posted.

        I’m thrilled that the worker’s got sick time and credit where it’s due to anyone in the admin who helped make that happen. It doesn’t change the fact that the admin, with the help of AOC and others in Congress broke a strike. That’s a terrible, dangerous, anti-worker precedent to set, and shame on anyone who voted for it and Biden for signing it.

        If I ask someone for $20 bucks for lunch and they kick me in the shin before giving me the money, am I supposed to be thankful and forget the fact that they just kicked me in the shin? Congress kicked workers in the proverbial, collective shin by blocking them from their right to strike.

        Here’s a decent article from Jacobin written by an RWU representative making exactly that point: https://jacobin.com/2023/04/railroad-workers-united-aoc-strike-vote-rank-and-file

        And here’s a decent rundown of the situation from a decent socialist source (even if it is Trot): https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2023/04/19/jaco-a19.html

      • MxM111@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Without disagreeing with you on message, I have a request to adjust delivery of such. Please consider leaving personal attacks on reddit, not here in fediverse.

        • TheOminousBulge@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Fair enough, I’ll try to tone it down in the future.

          Disunity will lose us this election. We don’t have the luxury of being picky about our candidates here. The alternative to Biden is fascism, full stop. Anyone who presents themselves as opposed to Christian fascism but continues to oppose Biden (especially with factual inaccuracies) tends to make me doubt their honesty, or their intelligence. And it should make everyone here suspicious as well.

          • MxM111@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            My personal worry that while I actually like Biden, policy-wise (not everything, but he exceeded my expectations), he will lose election to anyone younger than Trump.

            • Zaktor@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              If the Republicans put forward anyone under 70 they better keep Biden away from stairs for the entire election cycle. Voters are way too dumb to rationally evaluate “really old” vs. “fascist” if they have video of one thing and just vague warnings of the other. I don’t think it’s a sure thing he’ll lose, but it’s a very real possibility in an environment and cycle where it really shouldn’t be.