• 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    9 months ago

    Image is European but I’m pretty sure here in California trying to obscure your plate is illegal. Though I’m not sure what actually counts against it, since I know a couple of people with those bullshit plastic films that claim to obscure your plate from traffic cams but not from people looking at it.

    They don’t actually work, but I feel like the intent behind using them could get you in trouble.

    • VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’m pretty sure obscuring your plates is illegal in most places in Europe. How much anyone actually cares probably depends on specific locality.

      • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I don’t see how. The premise of these cameras is that anybody is allowed to film in public. All you’re doing is showing something in public which is perfectly legal. It doesn’t damage the camera. If they decide to use the image from their camera to enter text into a database, then that’s on them if something bad happens. You have no control over what happens inside of their computer. It’s no different than someone blindly copy pasting commands into their Linux terminal and deleting system 32.

        • Solemarc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          As far as I’m aware cybercrime is generally: “anything done maliciously involving a computer” intentionally sticking a drop table command over your plates because you’re expecting something to read your plate and input it into a db might count.

        • 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          All you’re doing is showing something in public which is perfectly legal.

          no, it is not, showing something in public is often not legal, it - as is often the case - depend on the context.

          It doesn’t damage the camera.

          it damages the database.

          then that’s on them if something bad happens. You have no control over what happens inside of their computer.

          no, that is on you, because you made that clearly intentionally malicious input. it is the same as if you had used the keyboard, the input method is really not important.

          do you think that if you successfully hack a bank and steal some money you will get away with the defense of “all i did was send your computer some input, sending input to computers is perfectly legal and i really don’t have any control over what is going inside it”?

          that is 5 year’s old idea of how law works.

          • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            So what you’re saying is that anytime sometime is filming or photographing someone else in public the person being filmed or photographed is

            Responsible for what the camera sees

            Is a direct user of any database or computer used to process the images

            The person filming is allowed to impose restrictions because they are filming other people in public

            That doesn’t sound quite right to me

            • 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              So what you’re saying is (…)

              no, that is not what i am saying.

              That doesn’t sound quite right to me

              it would help if you stopped putting fabricated nonsense into other people’s mouths. then you wouldn’t have to wonder whether that nonsense “sounds quite right.”

      • I made a joke elsewhere about Amazon’s search thing using AI to generate a string that would crash the Amazon server and thought about that too afterward. If that actually worked, could someone be charged with a crime?

        • Solemarc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Id guess maybe, if I generated a string using AI and intentionally crashed their stuff, it might be crime.

        • SeabassDan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I’m only using the tools provided, not accessing anything that’s clearly pointed out I shouldn’t. If anything, that question field is specifically designed for me to use.

          • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            If I go to a hardware store and start taking a sledgehammer to the walls “I’m only using the tools provided” is not going to be a valid defense.

            • SeabassDan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Not a good comparison, the sledgehammer isn’t meant to be used in the store, the search function in the website is, don’t be dumb.

              • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                Okay, the hardware store has a saw for customers to cut planks to the length they need. There are many ways they could “misuse the tool provided”

                • SeabassDan@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  That actually makes a lot more sense, I’ll accept that. Although there are signs saying not to misuse the tools provided. Don’t see any of that on Amazon. At least not yet.

    • space@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Where I live, you only need valid plates to drive on public roads. If the car is parked or you drive on private property, there’s no problem. The procedure for getting plates requires you to not have plates for like 2 or 3 days.

      Cars can still be identified by the VIN which is on the windshield.

      • Cars can still be identified by the VIN which is on the windshield.

        You mean that tiny little plate of numbers you can only see by being up close to inspect? How does that help find, say, a suspect in a hit and run? You’re sure as hell not gonna be able to read the VIN off a moving vehicle unless you’re hanging onto the hood for dear life.

        • space@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Did you even read my post? I said that you need plates to drive, but you don’t need plates if you are parked (or on private property). If a car is parked, you have plenty of time to read the VIN. Driving on public roads without plates is illegal and you risk jail time.