The context is the HD video footage of the IDF drone striking obvious unarmed civilians.
No. It shows a drone strike against four persons that are at the time of the strike unarmed, as far as this can be seen on the defenetly not “HD” video.
Where’s the context showing these people were enemy combatants deserving a death sentence by drone strike?
It’s not in this video. That’s what the words “there is no context” were pointing too.
Do you always take the “guilty until proven innocent” line, or is this a race thing?
I take the “I don’t have enoth context to judge the footage shown here” line. This is independent of the nation or race shown in the footage.
I’m not saying that the video could not show unarmed civilians beeing shot. But since there is not entoth information avaible I reserve the right to stay critical and not blindly trust the framing that the article puts on it.
No. It shows a drone strike against four persons that are at the time of the strike unarmed, as far as this can be seen on the defenetly not “HD” video.
It’s not in this video. That’s what the words “there is no context” were pointing too.
I take the “I don’t have enoth context to judge the footage shown here” line. This is independent of the nation or race shown in the footage.
I’m not saying that the video could not show unarmed civilians beeing shot. But since there is not entoth information avaible I reserve the right to stay critical and not blindly trust the framing that the article puts on it.