• dustyData@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Research friendly fire incidents and the Hannibal directive in the IDF. No one kills Jews more efficiently than Israel.

              • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                17
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                Thats because the tense has to agree with the subject, subject being Israel in present times, it doesn’t necessarily mean that the ‘no one’ means ‘no on in present times’. No where in grammer does verb tense indicate anything other than the subjects time.

                • lugal@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  This is wrong on so many levels that I hope you are joking.

                  Verbs agree in person and number with the subject. “no one” is 3. person singular. Subjects don’t have time. Only verbs have tense.

                  If subjects had tense and “no one” was present, then the sentence would still be present. In that case, you would need to use the past form of “no one” to indicate tense.

                  Rereading your comment: Israel isn’t the subject.

                  • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    6
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    7 months ago

                    What is the past form of ‘no one’ oh right, its still ‘no one’ so OPs intent to exclude the past isn’t clear. ‘is killing’ is the conjugation to use if you want to exclude the past, literally what it’s there for.

                • kibiz0r@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Thats [sic] presently because the tense presently has to agree with the subject, subject presently being Israel in present times, it doesn’t necessarily presently mean that the ‘no one’ presently means ‘no on in present times’. No where in grammer [sic] does verb tense presently indicate anything other than the subjects [sic] time.

                  Clarified so no one would presently confuse your statement to refer presently to Old English.

      • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        Netanyahu knew about Hamas militants moving funds from Iran and Egypt warned him about the impending attack, but he did nothing. I suppose he was preoccupied with containing protests against his judicial reforms but he may have thought letting Hamas to thrive in order to justify his fascism will do him favours. And boy he was wrong! As much as Israel have gone further right, at least they did not let themselves be hoodwinked and many ordinary Israelis have gone back to the streets to protest against Netanyahu and his failure to prevent the attack by Hamas. The opposition will have easy victory in the next election.