• goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    8 months ago

    Do wonder what excuse mitch would use this time to not appointment a replacement before the election

    • edge [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Dems still control the Senate, so McConnell can’t do anything. Sinema could do something though.

      • StalinIsMaiWaifu@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        8 months ago

        Dems controlled the Senate for a while last time too. They were too afraid to use a simple majority to pass through any of their nominations though. 60 votes were required to add someone to the supreme Court, dems had a simple majority and were unwilling to lower because “then the Republicans would use it.”

        Lot of good that did

        • edge [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          26
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          They actually did remove the filibuster for lower court nominations. Which gave the Republicans easy justification to remove it for Kavanaugh a few years later.

          So they essentially handed the Republicans that power without ever using it themselves. Strategic geniuses.

          But now that it’s gone, they are shooting themselves in the foot - again - by not having Sotomayor (and Kagan really) retire.