They’re fucking passive. They should directly implicate the US. Instead of “We are on unceded land of the Salish people” we should say “The US government stole this land from the Salish people and genocided their tribe”

  • barrbaric [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    It’s a thing lib governments/companies do in the US/Canada/Australia, typically at the start of presentations or as part of an e-mail signature, where they say something like “We recognize that we are on the unceded land of local indigenous people”. Depending on who’s saying it, it can be either sincere (but misguided) or virtue signaling (typically from the government entities that would actually have the power to do something: “People care about this so we’ll say it but we’re sure as hell not doing anything”).

    IMO it’s a lib way of recognizing that we stole and genocided our way through the land of the US/Canada/Australia and we feel bad which ironically makes it less likely for people to do anything to actually support righting those wrongs because they feel that at least something is being done. Kind of like how voting in our sham federal elections that will result in no change is 100% of the political activity of the average american, and they feel like they’ve done their part.

    • itappearsthat@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      8 months ago

      ironically makes it less likely for people to do anything to actually support righting those wrongs because they feel that at least something is being done

      I don’t actually think this is true. I guarantee you if you talked to people who do land acknowledgements they’d be more in favor of land back policies than your average USian who has never even thought about it.

    • zed_proclaimer [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I believe it started in academia, in sociological or anthropological circles. It was a thing that the more left-leaning or social-liberal professors started to do to challenge their students and raise awareness in a somewhat non-confrontational manner (If you started telling all the rich white liberal kids that they were the enemy and beneficiaries of genocide right off the bat they will go aggro and storm out and clam up).

      From there it got co-opted by the administrative class that rent-seeks off the massive cost of higher education, and from there it jumped from consultants to HR departments to PR departments of corporations and NGOs, and eventually to the DNC. It really gained speed during 2020 during the George Floyd protests as yet another way to jump on the bandwagon of progressive causes like BLM.