• Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I think it depends on the goal. If I’m trying to stop a corporation from doing something profitable a large union, one that contains most corpo workers, including the ones producing this profit, can strike, halting the production that generates this profit. The union could do this for a moral reason. If the union however contains for the sake of argument 1% of the workers and none of the ones doing the work in question, then staging a protest can’t force a stop to the morally reprehensible production. It also makes this 1% an easy target to get rid of thus making it harder to organize more workers needed to stop production. So if I wanted to gain this power over the corpo, I would probably protest outside of union capacity.

    E: They’re already gone…

    • WallEx@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah, american employee protection sucks … Where I live you could easily fight being fired for this. So maybe thats where our different stances come from.

      • gian @lemmy.grys.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        If there is a criminal charge or conviction I think you would be fired in most countries.

        • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          This is probably why they called the cops, so they can fire them for an obvious cause and not have to deal with any questions.

        • WallEx@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          What would be the crime here? Am I missing something? Protesting is not (or shouldn’t be) against the law, as long as you don’t behave illegally)