The choice Yanukovich made was in direct contradiction with what the democratically-elected Ukrainian Parliament had been “overwhelmingly” working toward. You think Yanukovich unilaterally scrapping that work, ignoring the will of the Ukrainian people, and reorienting toward Russia was beneficial, so how was it beneficial?
The larger point is that you have to be a gullible idiot or malicious NATO shill to not presume that regime change on Russia’s doorstep just happens organically without American involvement. USA’s footprint in all of Europe since WW2 has been massive and the ones who don’t see it are usually the ones too busy licking the boot.
The choice Yanukovich made was in direct contradiction with what the democratically-elected Ukrainian Parliament had been “overwhelmingly” working toward. You think Yanukovich unilaterally scrapping that work, ignoring the will of the Ukrainian people, and reorienting toward Russia was beneficial, so how was it beneficial?
deleted by creator
So your argument is “Ha!”?
You still haven’t said anything about how the US was involved in Euromaidan
US funded the Euromaidan protests.
https://mronline.org/2022/03/08/national-endowment-for-democracy-deletes-records-of-funding-projects-in-ukraine/
The larger point is that you have to be a gullible idiot or malicious NATO shill to not presume that regime change on Russia’s doorstep just happens organically without American involvement. USA’s footprint in all of Europe since WW2 has been massive and the ones who don’t see it are usually the ones too busy licking the boot.
Now go troll some other instance.
deleted by creator
It wouldn’t have led to a massively destructive war, for a start.