It sounds like the company is now blocking access from "bootleg" APKs.
  • Rabbit R1 AI box is actually an Android app in a limited $200 box, running on AOSP without Google Play.
  • Rabbit Inc. is unhappy about details of its tech stack being public, threatening action against unauthorized emulators.
  • AOSP is a logical choice for mobile hardware as it provides essential functionalities without the need for Google Play.
      • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldEnglish
        61·
        6 months ago

        Perhaps the problem is that I never bothered to ask anything trivial enough, but you’d think that two rhyming words starting with 'L" would be simple.

        • CaptDust@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
          2·
          6 months ago

          “AI” is a really dumb term for what we’re all using currently. General LLMs are not intelligent, it’s assigning priorities to tokens (words) in a database, based on what tokens were provided before it, to compare and guess the next most logical word and phrase, really really fast. Informed guesses, sure, but there’s not enough parameters to consider all the factors required to identify a rhyme.

          That said, honestly I’m struggling to come up with 2 rhyming L words? Lol even rhymebrain is failing me. I’m curious what you went with.

        • MxM111@kbin.social
          22·
          6 months ago

          Ok, by asking you mean that you find somewhere questions that someone identified as being answered wrongly by LLM, and asking yourself.

    • magic_lobster_party@kbin.run
      53·
      6 months ago

      I’ve asked GPT4 to write specific Python programs, and more often than not it does a good job. And if the program is incorrect I can tell it about the error and it will often manage to fix it for me.

      • FlorianSimon@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
        21·
        6 months ago

        You have every right not to, but the “useless” word comes out a lot when talking about LLMs and code, and we’re not all arguing in bad faith. The reliability problem is still a strong factor in why people don’t use this more, and, even if you buy into the hype, it’s probably a good idea to temper your expectations and try to walk a mile in the other person’s shoes. You might get to use LLMs and learn a thing or two.

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.worldEnglish
          12·
          6 months ago

          I only “believe the hype” because a good developer friend of mine suggested I try copilot so I did and was impressed. It’s an amazing technical achievement that helps me get my job done. It’s useful every single day I use it. Does it do my job for me? No of fucking course not, I’m not a moron who expected that to begin with. It speeds up small portions of tasks and if I don’t understand or agree with its solution, it’s insanely easy not to use it.

          People online mad about something new is all this is. There are valid concerns about this kind of tech, but I rarely see that. Ignorance on the topic prevails. Anyone calling ai “useless” in a blanket statement is necessarily ignorant and doesn’t really deserve my time except to catch a quick insult for being the ignorant fool they have revealed themselves to be.

          • FlorianSimon@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
            31·
            6 months ago

            I’m glad that you’re finding this useful. When I say it’s useless, I speak in my name only.

            I’m not afraid to try it out, and I actually did, and, while I was impressed by the quality of the English it spits out, I was disappointed with the actual substance of the answers, which makes this completely unusable for me in my day to day life. I keep trying it every now and then, but it’s not a service I would pay for in its current state.

            Thing is, I’m not the only one. This is the opinion of the majority of people I work with, senior or junior. I’m willing to give it some time to mature, but I’m unconvinced at the moment.

            • TrickDacy@lemmy.worldEnglish
              12·
              6 months ago

              You would need to be pulling some trickery on Microsoft to get access to copilot for more than a single 30 day trial so I’m skeptical you’ve actually used it. Sounds like you’re using other products which may be much worse. It also sounds like you work in a conservative shop. Good luck with that

              • FlorianSimon@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
                31·
                6 months ago

                I have not tried Copilot, no. I’m not giving any tool money, personal info and access to my code when it can’t reliably answer a question like: “does removing from a std::vector invalidate iterators?” (not a prompt I tried on LLMs but close enough).

                That shit’s just dangerous, for obvious reasons. Especially when you consider the catastrophic impact these kinds of errors can have.

                There needs to be a fundamental shift to something that detects and fixes the garbage, which just isn’t there ATM.

                • TrickDacy@lemmy.worldEnglish
                  12·
                  6 months ago

                  Yeah you just illustrated you have no idea what copilot is like. But you were convinced you were an expert on it. Lol

                  • FlorianSimon@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
                    31·
                    6 months ago

                    I thought you were not reading me anymore?

                    I never said I was an expert on Copilot, I’ve consistently said LLMs are not where they should be in terms of reliability, which is also true of Copilot.

                    Edit: oh and sorry for not being willing to waste my time trying out every new piece of tech on the block when all they’re doing is rehashing unsound ideas 🤷‍♂️