Biden and Trump agree on debates in June and September, but working out details could be challenging
apnews.com
President Joe Biden says he's accepted an invitation from CNN to a June 27 debate after announcing he won’t participate in fall presidential debates sponsored by the nonpartisan commission that’s organized them for more than three decades.

Biden’s campaign proposed that the first debate between the presumptive Democratic and Republican nominees be held in late June and the second in September before early voting begins. Trump responded to the letter in an interview with Fox News digital, calling the proposed dates “fully acceptable to me” and joked about providing his own transportation.

  • A Phlaming Phoenix@lemm.ee
    4·
    6 months ago

    I worry that not doing debates for this cycle would be the start of a tradition of not doing them anymore, ever. To some degree, I’m in favor of doing them even knowing they’re only ceremonial.

    But even as I write that out, I wonder if the whole thing needs a facelift. This kind of televised debate was made up in a world where television had the broadest media reach. It was a public service to broadcast debates, and there was a time when that might make up the majority of what a voter knew about the candidates.

    Now we have the Internet and no need to shoehorn a Very Formal Debate into a prime time slot. Debates could be shorter and focused on the details of particular issues, allowing the candidates to converse more directly on topics. I would listen to a whole year of weekly podcast episodes like that leading up to an election.

    • Blackbeard@lemmy.worldEnglish
      2·
      6 months ago

      You may be correct, but if we still have free and fair elections in 2028 (I have my doubts), and if we have 2 brand new candidates, the demand for a debate will be higher. I just don’t think anyone wants to hear from these two men, in particular, because we’ve already heard everything they have to say.