• Nora@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I had an idea when these first AI image generators started gaining traction. Flood the CSAM market with AI generated images( good enough that you can’t tell them apart.) In theory this would put the actual creators of CSAM out of business, thus saving a lot of children from the trauma.

    Most people down vote the idea on their gut reaction tho.

    Looks like they might do it on their own.

    • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s such an emotional topic that people lose all rationale. I remember the Reddit arguments in the comment sections about pedos, already equalizing the term with actual child rapists, while others would argue to differentiate because the former didn’t do anything wrong and shouldn’t be stigmatized for what’s going on in their heads but rather offered help to cope with it. The replies are typically accusations of those people making excuses for actual sexual abusers.

      I always had the standpoint that I do not really care about people’s fictional content. Be it lolis, torture, gore, or whatever other weird shit. If people are busy & getting their kicks from fictional stuff then I see that as better than using actual real life material, or even getting some hands on experiences, which all would involve actual real victims.

      And I think that should be generally the goal here, no? Be it pedos, sadists, sociopaths, whatever. In the end it should be not about them, but saving potential victims. But people rather throw around accusations and become all hysterical to paint themselves sitting on their moral high horse (ironically typically also calling for things like executions or castrations).

      • Cupcake1972
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yeah, exact same feelings here. If there is no victim then who exactly is harmed?

    • Itwasthegoat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      My concern is why would it put them out of business? If we just look at legal porn there is already beyond huge amounts already created, and the market is still there for new content to be created constantly. AI porn hasn’t noticeably decreased the amount produced.

      Really flooding the market with CSAM makes it easier to consume and may end up INCREASING the amount of people trying to get CSAM. That could end up encouraging more to be produced.

      • Nora@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        The market is slightly different tho. Most CSAM is images, with Porn theres a lot of video and images.

    • jaschen@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s also a victimless crime. Just like flooding the market with fake rhino horns and dropping the market price to a point that it isn’t worth it.

    • PirateJesus@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      It would be illegal in the United States. Artistic depictions of CSAM are illegal under the PROTECT act 2003.

      • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        And yet it’s out there in droves on mainstream sites, completely without issue. Drawings and animations are pretty unpoliced.