The new standards require American automakers to increase fuel economy so that, across their product lines, their passenger vehicles would average 65 miles per gallon by 2031, up from 48.7 miles today. The average mileage for light trucks, including pickup trucks and sport utility vehicles, would have to reach 45 miles per gallon, up from 35.1 miles per gallon. Selling electric vehicles and hybrids would help bring up the average mileage per gallon across their product lines.

    • Ranvier@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yes it’s a little ridiculous. At least the “light truck” mpg requirement is getting increased too, though not as much as the car one:

      The new standards require American automakers to increase fuel economy so that, across their product lines, their passenger cars would average 65 miles per gallon by 2031, up from 48.7 miles today. The average mileage for light trucks, including pickup trucks and sport utility vehicles, would have to reach 45 miles per gallon, up from 35.1 miles per gallon.

  • HornyOnMain@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    5 months ago

    This was absolutely necessary. Car manufacturers have been abusing the previous rules which had lesser requirements for “light trucks”. Have you noticed how almost all ‘cars’ nowadays are the size of an SUV? This is a huge change and will affect so many more things positively(less fatal accidents for one) than JUST miles per gallon.

      • HornyOnMain@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        It is, and it’s unfortunate that it hasn’t been eliminated which needs to be the end goal. Still, I think this will have hugely positive impacts on the culture around cars, and even if I’m wrong EV’s will lead the way which this bill still leads us to. If it’s all electricity and the manufacturers don’t need to worry about fuel conversion, I feel they’ll be less incentivized to make monster size vehicles since added weight is decreased performance with no cost benefits for them.

    • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      I hope we have a breakthrough and battery technology. EVs are awesome though not ideal for pedestrians nor guardrails. Very, very heavy.

  • Norgur@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    I was impressed initially, even sat through the NY Times yapping about “Mr. Biden” and what “Mr. Trump” said about “Mr. Biden” (calling them both Mr. XY is really weird to me) but then I read that they are keeping the light trucks exception and all awe was replaced by utter resignation… sad.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      5 months ago

      They are…but tightening fuel economy for light trucks too. Which matters.

      Would be nice if it was more, but this is what we’ve been able to get right now.

  • cranakis@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Queue up “the Democrats are outlawing gas cars” handwringing by the conservative simps.

    • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      Queue up “the Democrats are outlawing gas cars” handwringing by the conservative simps.

      I’m good with this change but we have to admit that functionally its not too far off the mark. Even the article notes “…strict new limits on tailpipe pollution that are designed to ensure that the majority of new passenger cars and light trucks sold in the United States are all-electric or hybrids by 2032…”

      So while ICE isn’t being directly “outlawed” they are changing the rules to get a very similar result; the “conservative simps” won’t be wrong exactly when they say it.

      • cranakis@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Or gas vehicle manufacturers could spend real money on environmental r and d to meet the mark in the time allowed. Whatever it takes to lower our greenhouse gas emissions.

        The push for more E.V.s comes as the world’s leading climate experts say that retiring the internal combustion engine is critical to staving off the most deadly effects of global warming.

    • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      We (Canadians) use L/100km more often.

      A hybrid sedan might get 3 to 4 L/100km in ideal Canadian conditions using a lot more of the battery, closer to 5 in winter.

      Your normal sedan ranges from 5 to 8. (40MPG = 7 L/100km)

      An SUV ranges from 8 to 13. (25MPG = 10.9L/100km)

      A pick up truck will be from 9 to 16 L/100km. (20MPG = 13.9L/100km)

    • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Good but does anyone outside the US even use equivalent gasoline volume to measure electrical energy? Ergo, how much is that in kWh/100 km?

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    In April, the Environmental Protection Agency issued strict new limits on tailpipe pollution that are designed to ensure that the majority of new passenger cars and light trucks sold in the United States are all-electric or hybrids by 2032, up from 7.6 percent last year.

    In addition to the regulations, the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act, championed by Mr. Biden, provides tax credits for buyers of new and used electric vehicles, along with incentives for charging stations and grants and loans for manufacturers.

    But at a rally in Arizona on Thursday, Mr. Trump struck an uncharacteristically supportive note on electric vehicles as he heaped praise on Elon Musk, the chief executive of Tesla.

    “Not only will these new standards save Americans money at the pump every time they fill up, they will also decrease harmful pollution and make America less reliant on foreign oil,” Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg said in a statement.

    Dan Becker, director of the Safe Climate Transport Campaign at the Center for Biological Diversity, said that the mileage rule should have been stronger, calling it “weak” and saying the administration “caved to automaker pressure.”

    “The Biden Administration is willing to sacrifice the American auto industry and its workers in service of its radical green agenda,” Russell Coleman, the Kentucky attorney general, who is leading the lawsuit against the E.P.A., said in a statement.


    The original article contains 1,137 words, the summary contains 225 words. Saved 80%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    This is mpg across a product line. Not per vehicle and apparently without regard to production level or pricing. And since it’s an average across a product line an automaker could add a hybrid deluxe version at 300% markup that no one buys and still achieve compliance. Theoretically an automaker could actually worsen fuel economy if they added EV or hybrid versions to the product line.

    I can’t even sarcastically joke these standards were written by industry.

  • Lemming6969@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    We need laws to ban non-business ownership of trucks and large SUVs. They can only be privately rented or licensed by a business. Fuck solo commuters hauling nothing in huge vehicles.

    • ExFed@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I’d rather establish licensing/training requirements for light truck operation. Nobody likes it when someone takes away their stuff. But convince them that the only people allowed to operate such heavy machinery are “elite” and they’ll gladly take pride.

      Normal passenger car driver’s licenses in most of North America have such a comically low bar because people need them for life. You lose your license, you can’t live. It’s not just harder. You physically cannot get to work, get food, meet friends, etc. It’s bonkers. Solving that problem is hard. But making sure that people who really absolutely shouldn’t be driving something as dangerous as a truck can’t get one “just because it’s cool” is a different, much easier solved problem.