• Hello_Kitty_enjoyer [none/use name]@hexbear.netEnglish
    1·
    5 months ago

    because Europe has enough nukes to end all of those countries as well.

    those countries are ending anyway so not an argument

    Economic warfare and traditional warfare

    the economics of half your continent turning into an oven

    the leaders basically all know this and that’s why they’ve tacitly agreed to let a bunch of 3rd world people in. And why Modi and Xi are content to let 10 guys brawl it out in Ladakh instead of doing anything real

    • radiofreeval [any]@hexbear.netEnglish
      1·
      5 months ago

      Still, what leader is willing to publicly kill 95% of their population in a day so a small, random minority can live in the North. This type of war is a lose-lose situation for all parties.

      While nuclear winter is worse for the Northern hemisphere, we would be seeing 16C air temperature changes, which is significantly worse than the 3-4C of expected climate change.

      • Hello_Kitty_enjoyer [none/use name]@hexbear.netEnglish
        1·
        5 months ago

        Still, what leader is willing to publicly kill 95% of their population in a day so a small, random minority can live in the North.

        Basically any leader elected by hundreds of millions of angry 3rd world people, lol (hot weather also makes people even angrier, scientifically confirmed)

        This type of war is a lose-lose situation for all parties

        It is not. They were going to lose anyway