• cjk@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 days ago

    I did not want to make a business out of this library. I don’t want money for it.

    All I would’ve wanted is that the people at Apple would’ve given me a heads up beforehand, so I would’ve been prepared for it and not caught on surprise. And a that they do a version upgrade when I release a new bugfix release.

    This is not a license issue. I was well aware of the consequences when I chose the MIT license. This is not about money.

    • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 days ago

      You specifically said you chose the MIT license because you wanted to use it in commercial projects. That’s business, no matter how small. As the owner of the property, you could have used any and all licenses available to you. Also, if you wanted to require users of your code to attribute or notify you, you could have. If you want to be disappointed in their behavior that’s perfectly fine, too. Corporations usually disappoint if you have any altruistic expectations of them.

      • cjk@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        5 days ago

        Ah, that‘s the angle you’re coming from.

        In this regard you are right. I could’ve chosen AGPL and use it in my commercial project nonetheless. I wasn’t aware of that at the time, and that was a mistake.

        That said, I don’t expect all users to notify me. But if a company like Apple, with millions of users, exposes me to even a fraction of its users - then yes. I expect a mail beforehand. I did not sign up for this.

        But I agree with your last part again ;)