• PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    Considering he went to war in the 40s, I think he would recognize this America. For all of our flaws, we’re doing better now than we were then.

    Like he said - he fought not because America is great, but because it is fragile. America is not some shining precious jewel, it’s a deeply flawed creature - the only thing that marks it as worth saving is the ideal that all people are equal. The further we get from that, the closer we come to being nothing more than trash and a rag.

    • notsure@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      But in that fragility, he understood that we were only as strong as our weakest link

    • MindTraveller@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      I agree with your statements on ideals, but I do not think America was on the precipice of becoming a fascist dictatorship in the 40s.

      • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        You might be surprised, there were a lot of pro nazi Americans. The attack on Pearl Harbor changed what might have been a quiet agreement with the new reich

    • masquenox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      5 months ago

      For all of our flaws, we’re doing better now than we were then.

      Really? How many Palestinians were the US helping to murder back in the 40s? How many Afghans? How many Iraqis?

      Or are you just happy that the people being murdered happen to be brown people and not ones you think should be included in the “white enough” club?