kittenzrulz claims that the takeover of this community was entirely over links getting burned out. this post would appear to contradict that.
furthermore, they completely disregarded my points in the questions i asked, particularly around the ideological motive around the changes they made when giving feedback, and failed to respond when i pushed them on the point, despite posting elsewhere.
i would argue that both the mod of this community, and the admin of the instance, are hostile to anarchist and leftist politics, and cannot be trusted. recommend finding a new instance.
Every single person I’ve interacted with trying to preach the wonders of soulism has been controlling and belligerent towards other leftists and trans people.
Starting with DRONERIGHTS/PM_ME_FAT_ENBIES and ending (hopefully) with Mindgoblin and Grail.
I engaged with grail in good faith at first over soulism but at this point I’m wholly convinced that the philosophy where one can simply decide that someone else isn’t human probably isn’t the best because every single person slinging it has left me with a horrible experience.
I’m very glad link seems to be doing alright though if his tumblr is anything to go off of.
Even if he never sees this, I wish him the very best.
I engaged with grail in good faith at first over soulism but at this point I’m wholly convinced that the philosophy where one can simply decide that someone else isn’t human probably isn’t the best because every single person slinging it has left me with a horrible experience.
Doing a quick skim through claimed tenants, it does indeed appear that way. If I’m reading it correctly, the philosophy claims that objective reality is an unjust hierarchy… following that absurd line further, it means that everything is subjective and mutable at the whim of a given individual (is it anyone or just those who are more anti-realist than others?). So, social contract then also becomes mutable at an individual’s whim, etc. Seems like it rhymes heavily with right-wing “post-truth communities”.
It’s an “off compass” meme ideology.
That’s not really true anymore, and it wasn’t ever true if you ignore terminology and just look at the beliefs. Soulists have been fighting against imperialism for hundreds of years.
https://medium.com/@viridiangrail/a-history-of-soulism-b11a99fd54c4
Soulists do not believe in social contract theory. The social contract was invented by Enlightenment philosopher John Locke, the “father of liberalism”. Locke was a capitalist. Soulists are anarchists. We don’t like liberals.
When it comes to Soulists, you’re more likely to find utilitarians among our ranks. We punch Nazis not because Nazis violate the social contract, but because Nazis threaten to bring genocide and war. While a social contract theorist would happily deal with a Nazi who was polite, well-mannered, and followed all the rules, a Soulist would not. A Soulist would pull out the baseball bat and tell the Nazi to get the fuck out, no matter how well the Nazi follows the social contract.
Clearly not what happens in practice though given the events that’ve transpired over the past weeks caused by a soulist forcing their reality of support for liberalism/the party of polite fascists.
Well, I don’t know if you read My article about supporting Biden, but I made it very clear that any support for the Democrats should be fake, not real. I think that’s generally how other soulists feel about the issue too. Nobody wants to genuinely support the Democrats, it’s just a means to prevent genocide. I for one take genocide very seriously and can’t do nothing about it. If I’m understanding the other side’s position on this issue, I think this might be an issue of us disagreeing on the inaction vs inaction problem. See, I view making a choice not to act as a form of action. Morally equivalent to an action of equal effect. It seems to Me that a lot of the more moderately inclined people on this issue who prefer inaction, are doing so because you think a slightly bad action is worse than a really bad inaction.
So we’re back to utilitarianism as the deciding factor. The soulist only cares about the consequences. They don’t care if one choice means doing something and one means doing nothing. But the deontologist has personal rules against doing a bad thing. Doing nothing, that’s fine. And if nothing turns out to have a worse outcome than something, so be it. The utilitarian disagrees. They’ll sacrifice their principles to achieve a better outcome for the victims of genocide. They only care about the result.
So which tenant of soulism decides which group of people is worth genociding for another?
See, you lost me before with subjective reality and dropping useful nomenclature tools but, I do have to agree a lot with you on the utilitarianism and ethics of choice.
My allegiance to humanity (and any potential non-human sentience) is the most important part of my ideals. Critical analysis is also vital to choose the action most beneficial (without falling into the “ends justify the means” trap frequently seen in M-Ls). Inaction IS absolutely an action. In cases like the US elections, the data show that inaction and anti-electoralism have the same net result as supporting fascists.
The system in place offers two outcomes: a neoliberal + moderate + center-left party or a facist + theofascist party. While (neo)libs almost always ally with fascists over leftists every chance they get, they are objectively less likely to inflict the levels of human suffering that fascists will (and there is no concrete evidence supporting accelerationism). Any action or inaction is going to lead to one of these two in this system it is the fallacy of Denying the Correlative to suggest otherwise, based upon all available data. Anyone suggesting inaction or effort to support a spoiler to harm the chances of the neoliberal party is just saying that their personal moral high-ground and ideology is more important than the lives of Palestinians, Iranians, Jordanians, minorities in the West, other leftists, LGBTQ+ people, and humanity at large that would be harmed under a theofascist regime. All possible outcomes include continuation of ongoing genocide, the neoliberals might apply pressure to halt it, the theofascists would accelerate it and have verbalized the desire to bring a nuclear apocalypse to fulfill their doomsday cult prophecy.
Soulists do not believe in social contract theory. The social contract was invented by Enlightenment philosopher John Locke, the “father of liberalism”. Locke was a capitalist. Soulists are anarchists. We don’t like liberals.
I do have some philosophical disagreement there. I’m roughly an anarcho-syndicalist by ideology but don’t believe in the plausibility of an anarchic society in my lifetime. Tools of the oppressors can still have value. Social contract, at least as nomenclature, is a very useful tool for describing and theorizing around social cohesion in a non-hierarchical society. In order for humans to coexist in a mutually beneficial manner, they need to agree on “constants” that can be deemed objective. Without this, there can be an “impedence mismatch”, to draw an analogy from electronics, that can cause undue strife because of a lack of agreement on ethical basics. “Social Contract” can be a useful term/concept for describing this, even if not agreeing with the content of it proposed by liberals.
…While a social contract theorist would happily deal with a Nazi who was polite, well-mannered, and followed all the rules, a Soulist would not.
Here, I’d disagree with scoping. I think that you have put all who use Social Contract in the group of (neo)liberalism. I do not find this accurate. As I stated earlier, it is useful as a tool for describing basic ethical “constants” to enable social cohesion.
A Soulist would pull out the baseball bat and tell the Nazi to get the fuck out, no matter how well the Nazi follows the social contract.
Under an anarchic “Social Contract”, that would be the correct action. Those wishing to enforce unjust social hierarchies, inflict suffering sadistically, and commit mass murder would be violating “Social Contract” (not just under most forms of anarchism).
It’s really funny to me how a group that claims to believe reality is entirely subjective and that people should have the freedom to shape it as they choose are really insistent that everyone follow their exact system of beliefs.
Soulism doesn’t endorse assigning a species identity to someone else. We are all assigned human at birth, and this is an act of abuse against those of us who are not humans. Assigning a different species identity to a human would be the same violence and the same abuse. Using dehumanisation as a justification for further violence is even worse. Soulists believe that forcing someone else into a reality, including the reality of a particular species identity, is violent and wrong. Everyone deserves the right to choose their own species, and if they choose human, nobody should be able to take that away from them.
It is not my experience that the admins are hostile to anarchist, Ada has been supportive of my efforts related to the !anarchism@lemmy.blahaj.zone community I started.
i hope that continues to be the case. but i have absolutely no faith in this instance anymore i’m afraid.
Yea honestly I’ve never seen Ada handle any situation in a way that I find distasteful. From what I can tell they definitely lean anarchist and have explicitly stated that they support anarchist communities on this instance.
This isn’t an anarchist instance though. They aren’t going to ban people or whatever for having opinions they don’t agree with.
I think the situation with MindTraveller could have been handled better, but there’s no easy way to decide when and how to censor people like that.
Thanks for linking another anarchist comm for me to subscribe to <3
…huh? Im srry but this post just makes no sense at all?
in the first paragraph u say that the linked post contradicts that LOC left for being burnt out but that post doesn’t mention anything relevant to that
and on the last paragraph you say the mods of this community and the admins of this instance r hostile to anarchism and leftist politics which… is the opposite of what has always been the case?
I don’t know the current mod of this community well enough to speak on that but I can most certainly tell you that Ada (the instance admin) is not actively trying to be hostile to anarchist and leftist politics.
Thank you for directing people to the post advertising !soulism@lemmy.blahaj.zone! c/soulism is going to be an explicitly far-leftist place. We won’t tolerate any form of political apathy or centrism, or capitalist apologia, both of which include liberalism, so I’m sure it will be a great place for any regulars here to check out. We hope to cooperate with the leadership of Liberty Hub and end all the fighting that’s been going on for the past several weeks. Hopefully, this is the end of leftist infighting on Blahaj.
The end of leftist infighting would come if you simply stopped posting I think
Awesome.
Might have a new queer leftist community soon, presumably on db0. I’ve just gotten back from a trip but I’ve been in touch with someone interested in it, I’ll drop a post if there’s any news.
I’d also echo some of the other sentiments, I don’t think the instance mods are problematic especially Ada who has been supportive as far as I’ve seen, but kittenzrulz clearly should never have been given control over the community.
deleted by creator
