Especially when those 2nd, 3rd, + properties are being used as passive short term rentals. Observing the state of the housing situation “Hmm there aren’t enough homes for normal families to each have a chance, I should turn this extra property of mine into a vacation rental.” does this make said person a POS?

  • Technus@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    100
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    The problem isn’t people owning an extra house for a nest egg. It’s companies owning hundreds of them.

    • gusgalarnyk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      If housing is an investment (“a nest egg”) then the people and policies that support it as an investment will stand directly opposed to people and policies that want housing to be affordable and a right.

      Housing cannot be an investment vehicle akin to stocks in a society that meaningfully values housing for everyone as an objective to strive for.

    • rainynight65@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 months ago

      Real estate as an investment, retirement provision or object of speculation is precisely the problem. Every home that gets bought as an investment in an inflated housing market directly contributes to the problem, by cutting people out of the opportunity of ownership and making them dependent on paying rent.