☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.ml to news@hexbear.netEnglish · edit-23 months agoUS army says they made a $11M promotional deal with The Rock & the UFL which didn’t lead to a single new recruit and a projected loss of 38 enlistments.www.military.comexternal-linkmessage-square18fedilinkarrow-up1128arrow-down11cross-posted to: us_news@lemmygrad.mlusa@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1127arrow-down1external-linkUS army says they made a $11M promotional deal with The Rock & the UFL which didn’t lead to a single new recruit and a projected loss of 38 enlistments.www.military.com☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.ml to news@hexbear.netEnglish · edit-23 months agomessage-square18fedilinkcross-posted to: us_news@lemmygrad.mlusa@lemmy.ml
minus-squareFirefly7 [any]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·3 months agosmall correction: the article I think you’re referencing in the title ( https://www.military.com/daily-news/2024/07/30/armys-troubled-11-million-marketing-deal-rock-and-ufl-seemingly-didnt-yield-single-recruit.html) says that it resulted in a projected loss of 38 enlistments, rather than resulted in 38 recruits de-listing.
small correction: the article I think you’re referencing in the title ( https://www.military.com/daily-news/2024/07/30/armys-troubled-11-million-marketing-deal-rock-and-ufl-seemingly-didnt-yield-single-recruit.html) says that it resulted in a projected loss of 38 enlistments, rather than resulted in 38 recruits de-listing.
ah good catch, fixed