Children will be taught how to spot extremist content and misinformation online under planned changes to the school curriculum, the education secretary said.

Bridget Phillipson said she was launching a review of the curriculum in primary and secondary schools to embed critical thinking across multiple subjects and arm children against “putrid conspiracy theories”.

One example may include pupils analysing newspaper articles in English lessons in a way that would help differentiate fabricated stories from true reporting.

In computer lessons, they could be taught how to spot fake news websites by their design, and maths lessons may include analysing statistics in context.

  • tiramichu@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    87
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    This is great, honestly.

    If you go back to antiquity, education was about philosophy. It was about learning how to observe, and think critically, and see the world for what it is.

    And then in modern times, education became about memorisation - learning facts and figures and how to do this and that. And that way of teaching and learning just doesn’t fit any longer with what our digital age has become.

    In my opinion, we are heavily overdue for a revamp of what education should be, and what skills are most important to society in this post-truth world. Critical thinking is an important foundation to real knowledge that we don’t teach enough.

    • fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.federate.cc
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      “Critical thinking” was a buzzword when I was at school in the 80s.

      Memorisation is a component of learning, but the vast majority of any learning I’ve done has been understanding.

      Certainly children need to learn to be skeptical, but I hope we can do better than showing them biased articles from newspapers.

      • Mothra
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        Is it a buzzword though? I always took it as the ability to understand AND question in order to prove/disprove/ build upon said understanding.

        • FarraigePlaisteach@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          I think they mean that it was a buzzword because although it was mentioned, it wasn’t a substantial part of state education at the time. They’re saying that it “was” a buzzword, rather than that it is one.

          • Mothra
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            Fair enough! That makes sense

      • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        The difference between intelligence and wisdom. We have been prioritizing the former at the detriment of the latter.

        This is how you end up with people like Elon Musk who I will give the benefit of the doubt and say he isn’t dumb, but Christ he’s a moron.

        • wewbull@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          4 months ago

          I’m not sure you mean intelligence and wisdom.

          Intelligence is the capability to apply your brain to problems. Wisdom is the lessons you learn through experience.

          Maybe “knowledge Vs wisdom” is a better way of putting it.

      • qaz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        We were shown different news articles from about the same event and were given the task to point out their biases based on the differences. Do schools over there do that too?

        • wewbull@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          I did in history class, the point being that when trying to assess historical evidence you have to take into account the source of the information to understand the biases contained in it.

          It wasn’t in general classes though.

        • fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.federate.cc
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          I honestly don’t remember. That’s not a yes or a no but “I’m not sure”. The critical thinking they were talking about wasn’t necessarily relating to media though, but more general - like a habit of challenging assumed knowledge.

    • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      If you go back to antiquity, education was about philosophy.

      Well, formal education was. I’m pretty sure ancient Greeks Athenians still had to be taught to do things like follow instructions, and to read and write (If they were in a social class where literacy was even expected).

      Of course we should be doing a better job teaching students critical thinking skills, but let’s not fool ourselves into thinking ancient Greek children all spent their days having deep conversations with Aristotle in a park. Plato is even on record against reading because he thought it interfered with students’ ability to memorize things!