The main use case for LLMs is writing text nobody wanted to read. The other use case is summarizing text nobody wanted to read. Except they don’t do that either. The Australian Securities and…
fucking right! there’s this unearned assumption that just because the tech’s been invented, it must have worth. and, like, no? there’s so many dead ends in science and technology, and notoriously throwing money at something doesn’t change its fundamental nature
and now I’m pissed and trying to decide if it’s even worth explicitly adding “don’t be a debatelord asshole” to the TechTakes sidebar, cause it’s not like they’re gonna stop
Holy shit, imagine crying “waah, debatelord!” because someone is trying to follow some non-fallacious = non-fucking-stupid reasoning here. It’s almost like you want a circlejerk on the exact same level as those muppets burning effigies, just with the opposite discourse.
holy shit, imagine getting a second chance to not be a fucking debatelord and doubling down this hard
off you fuck
phallusy fallacy: posting like a cock
Since you’re the mod here, let me ask you.
People just out here acting like a fundamentally, inextricably unreliable and unethical technology has a “use case”
smdh
fucking right! there’s this unearned assumption that just because the tech’s been invented, it must have worth. and, like, no? there’s so many dead ends in science and technology, and notoriously throwing money at something doesn’t change its fundamental nature
and now I’m pissed and trying to decide if it’s even worth explicitly adding “don’t be a debatelord asshole” to the TechTakes sidebar, cause it’s not like they’re gonna stop
“We’re not saying it doesn’t have its flaws, but you need to appreciate the potential of the radium cockring!”
to wildly abword a phrase I’ve seen elsewhere: “idiocy can remain solvent longer than you can”
I literally showed a use case.
Myself highlighted that it’s unreliable plenty times across this comment chain.
I highlighted the lack of ethics at least once.
Still the same nirvana fallacy as the other user.
Holy shit, imagine crying “waah, debatelord!” because someone is trying to follow some non-fallacious = non-fucking-stupid reasoning here. It’s almost like you want a circlejerk on the exact same level as those muppets burning effigies, just with the opposite discourse.