AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 2 years agoGoogle is charging its employees $99 a night to stay at its on-campus hotel to help "transition to the hybrid workplace."gizmodo.comexternal-linkmessage-square187fedilinkarrow-up11.04Karrow-down116 cross-posted to: technews@radiation.party
arrow-up11.03Karrow-down1external-linkGoogle is charging its employees $99 a night to stay at its on-campus hotel to help "transition to the hybrid workplace."gizmodo.comAllonzeeLV@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 2 years agomessage-square187fedilink cross-posted to: technews@radiation.party
minus-squareTransplantedSconie@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up44arrow-down3·2 years agoBut then you can’t siphon off 99$ a night from them! Come on, everyone! We gotta get those profits up!
minus-squarepenguin@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up20arrow-down2·2 years agoIt has nothing to do with profits. It’s more profitable to have everyone work from home. Upper managers and executives simply prefer having everyone in the office because they like it. It’s their preference.
minus-squarepenguin@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down3·2 years agoIt’s not though. None of this back-to-office stuff is for real estate.
minus-squareDevdogg@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down1·2 years agoUhh, yes it is? I mean, if you take a look at how much real estate San Francisco has just in its downtown area that should tell you something.
But then you can’t siphon off 99$ a night from them!
Come on, everyone! We gotta get those profits up!
It has nothing to do with profits. It’s more profitable to have everyone work from home. Upper managers and executives simply prefer having everyone in the office because they like it. It’s their preference.
deleted by creator
It’s not though. None of this back-to-office stuff is for real estate.
Uhh, yes it is? I mean, if you take a look at how much real estate San Francisco has just in its downtown area that should tell you something.