cmeerw@programming.dev to C++@programming.devEnglish · edit-22 months agoThe empire of C++ strikes back with Safe C++ blueprintwww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square38fedilinkarrow-up138arrow-down12cross-posted to: programming@programming.devhackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
arrow-up136arrow-down1external-linkThe empire of C++ strikes back with Safe C++ blueprintwww.theregister.comcmeerw@programming.dev to C++@programming.devEnglish · edit-22 months agomessage-square38fedilinkcross-posted to: programming@programming.devhackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
minus-squareFizzyOrange@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·2 months agoNo it doesn’t, that’s bullshit.
minus-squarelad@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·2 months agoWell, there is cve-rs, just sayin’
minus-squarerobinm@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 months agoThe fact that rustc has bugs (which is what cve-rs exploit) doesn’t invalidate that rust the language is memory safe.
No it doesn’t, that’s bullshit.
Well, there is cve-rs, just sayin’
The fact that rustc has bugs (which is what cve-rs exploit) doesn’t invalidate that rust the language is memory safe.