I think then talks about jury nullification may be changed in such a way that no legal matter is discussed, but a jury is still inclined to act such that nullification happens, and that will be in accordance to the phrasing of the oath
Rust dev, I enjoy reading and playing games, I also usually like to spend time with friends.
You can reach me on mastodon @sukhmel@mastodon.online or telegram @sukhmel@tg
I think then talks about jury nullification may be changed in such a way that no legal matter is discussed, but a jury is still inclined to act such that nullification happens, and that will be in accordance to the phrasing of the oath
I would expect only the wrong lessons will be learnt. But I already saw a headline about another insurance company reverting some stupid policy, so maybe correct ones will be learnt, too.
Which also implies that ey is a Nazi, too, by the same logic.
Nah, I’d say far from close
Look how sweet, they’re holding hands pincers
Yeah, I wanted to reference Dune, too, but then thought that it’s not a very rare trope. On a related note, I took a look at tvtropes and it says that in the Dune the AI didn’t wage war, it was humans that didn’t like what AI does and prohibited it. I read the books too long ago to remember if this is so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Yes, but many consider it this way
Yeah, but they literally used the term as used in Warhammer lore: A.I.
In Warhammer AI is forbidden on the grounds of past wars with humanity
Almost nowhere but America exists /s
If they managed to decrease from 190%/year to 2%/month (which is 27%/year) that’s still an impressive result. Not as impressive to publish when you want to make a click bait.
I’m not sure how to put that to percentages thought, is it 86% and 143 percent points decrease?
I never thought about it from this angle. But I did think about it from a different one: loans allow for an increase in demand and that increases prices. So either way, it will up the inflation
It may as well be accounted in the inflation, but with a lower weight. Usually the institution responsible for calculation of the inflation will publish the methodology so one can see for emselve, real perceived inflation may be higher or even lower depending on what your consumption profile is.
It’ll become greater after 12 applications:
There’s no need for a precise solution since it’s integers anyway.
Since age tends to not decrease, that may make sense: once you reach 18 you get a signed token you can use forever.
Your token might be used by someone else, though
Only last year? I thought it was the whole last decade
Me? Me, specifically‽ He cared, it’s so sweet ❤️
Am I tipping myself?
Oh, I would be tipping generously at the self-service if I were tipping me through getting a discount.
…not as generously but that sure would be a weird businesses model to allow people to choose a discount instead of choosing to pay more
You be soft, hmm… 🤔
What you’re saying sounds to me a bit like one can break community rules if mods won’t notice right away. If community rules were broken, I don’t think it matters much if it happened right now or earlier. Besides, I would also expect that someone breaking the rules will not argue in good faith.
So, to me this example doesn’t prove what you imply.