• Pissnpink@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    It’s not what you said. You’re allowed to have preferences and you’re allowed to have your own beliefs about modesty, and to be with someone that shares in those beliefs. It’s the way you said it that reveals shitty attitude towards women. You imply that all women should act in accordance to your beliefs and that they are somehow lesser for not being up to your wifey material standards. The world doesn’t need conform to you. You’re weirdly judgy and you’ll probably get mad that others are judging you and your opinion but you can’t be shitty and not expect people to be shitty back.

        • NastyNative
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          3 months ago

          Incel with a family… please explain???

              • Shapillon@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 months ago

                Yeah ofc females is an issue. We have the word “women” which is more specific and less loaded.

                And no, tits aren’t sexual by essence. No body parts are and it’s all social constructs.

                • Peoples who don’t traditionally cover their chests don’t tend to sexualize breasts either.
                • At some point in France, ankles used to be sexualised. It seems silly now, doesn’t it?

                Plus lil kids tend to already see lots of tits since they feed on them.

                Yes I am weird but I’m also right 😉

              • Shapillon@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                The word females is an issue

                We have this neat little concept called “women” that is specific to humans and also refers to a social role.

                Using “female” is - by opposition - quite dehumanizing.

                but if they got their tits out in public in-front of lil kids…. Thats ok???

                First and foremost, kids spent their first few monthes suckling on tits. They kinda know what they look like. Or should breastfeeding women hide their breast from their infants? 🤣

                Then sexualising parts of the human body is a social construct:

                • Peoples who don’t usually cover their chests don’t tend to sexualise breasts either.
                • At some point it was considered inappropriate to show your ankles for a woman. It seems silly now doesn’t it?

                So since human breasts (and any body part by extension) aren’t intrinsically sexual, there should be no issue showing them to anyone, kids included.

                (Otoh I am obv not condoning any interactions with any kind of sexual intent with minors or young adults with a significant age gap)

                Youre weird af

                I am but I am also right 😉

      • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        They can’t find partners because MEN ARE AWFUL. Men (especially young men) are swinging so hard into fascism. Meanwhile, women are swinging the other way; or maybe standing still while the Overton window is dragged away from them. If you are looking for a man under 30, and you are not also a man under 30, you are fucked.

        You might have just as well pointed at all the young fascists who can’t find tradwives because they are so fucking toxic. Blaming women is arbitrary.