• acockworkorange
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      2 months ago

      Its not. Everything is open. You don’t even need an account to see the content.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        No, it does depend on instance admins for how it is used. Viewing Mona Lisa doesn’t make every tourist its owner.

        • acockworkorange
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          I um… what? We’re discussing privacy and external monitoring. Ownership is irrelevant. I think you might be crossing discussions, but just look at the OC.

          • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Much of the spying on people is done for monetary gains, which would be illegal if the platform doesn’t sell the rights to the content.

            E.G. Reddit sold comment usage rights to OpenAI for $60,000,000 USD.

            • acockworkorange
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Phew! I’m so glad you told me that, because we know no company or individual ever did anything illegal. DuPont hasn’t poisoned the whole planet, and OpenAI didn’t admit stealing content is the only way their business model can work.