• catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    if he walked out it would have put that entire location, the rest of our team both locally and extended, in a much worse situation. What it wouldn’t do is hurt the company or the executives.

    That’s not your problem, that’s the company’s problem. You still get paid the same. If you have issues, take them to your supervisor, and go on with your life.

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Unfortunately that’s not how it works.

      Boss turns around and says “new responsibilies. Get after them.” You’re especially fucked if the work is the type of tasks you are already responsible for.

      Sure, you can say no, or slow play it, but that just means you’ll either get a shitty review or get fired.

      I’m not justifying this, I’m recounting what often happens.

      Downvotes are hilarious. Doesn’t matter if you line it, it’s how it happens around the world.

      • acockworkorange
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        The downvotes are because you’re the kind of rug your boss cleans his boots on, making it worse for everybody in the company. You’re the problem employee.

        • GBU_28@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Nope, just aware how the real world works.

          When this happens my response is to go find another job

          No where in my comment did I say I felt it was a good thing, or acceptable. It’s just common. You assumed I am cool with it cause it fits your worldview

          Edit Tell me: you think you’re just going to say “no, I’m not gonna take on new or increased tasks” , and come out successfully at the end of the year? (In review, raise, or continued employment?)

          The only move is to leave or do the work

    • Bob Robertson IX @discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 month ago

      Except I don’t still get paid the same. Someone walked out last year and put the whole team in a tailspin and the rest of the team paid for it when review time came around and since we missed so many deadlines due to staffing issues no one got any sort of substantial raise. And missing your once-a-year raise doesn’t just impact your pay for that year, it impacts it for every year going forward.

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’m not sure I’d want to work somewhere that penalizes me for someone else’s faults.

        Have you considered finding a union to bring to your workplace?

        • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          So… most workplaces? Most companies have department wide goals and metrics that don’t change just because half of a department walks. Even in good workplaces, hiring to “right size” a team takes time, and most of the time the work still needs to be done, and there’s only so far management can stretch until it starts impacting external customers.

          It sucks terribly. It’s not fair. Life isn’t.

        • Bob Robertson IX @discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Trust me, I don’t want to work here either, but having spent 6 months looking for a job and eating through my savings and knowing that I’m in no position to do that again anytime soon, I don’t exactly have many options. And yes, I’ve considered a union, but I also don’t want to end up unemployed again so I’m not going to be the one to champion that.

          • catloaf@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            If you have the job now, why would you quit and burn savings instead of searching while you have stable income?

            And getting fired for attempting unionization is a pretty slam-dunk case for a labor lawyer, but I’m sure you wouldn’t want to go through that hassle.