The civil service examinations of Imperial China allowed the state to find the best candidates to staff the vast bureaucracy that governed China from the Han Dynasty onwards (206 BCE - 220 CE). The exams were a means for a young male of any class to enter that bureaucracy and so become a part of the gentry class of scholar-officials. The exams had multiple levels and were extremely difficult to pass, requiring extensive knowledge of Confucian classics, law, government, and oratory amongst other subjects. For the state, the system supplied not only able candidates who were selected on merit but also ensured an entire class developed which had sympathy with the ruling status quo. The exams were in place for over a thousand years and are the principal reason why education is still particularly revered in Chinese culture today.

Historical Development

The idea of recruiting officials to staff the imperial bureaucracy developed from the Han Dynasty. An Imperial Academy had been established in 124 BCE for scholars to study in depth the Confucian and Taoist classics, and by the end of the Han period, this institution was training an impressive 30,000 students each year. In general, the state held the view that education was a mark of a civilised society and in order to get the best administrators to run China’s vast territories efficiently, an entire class of scholar civil servants was required. This view would prevail under varying dynasties right up to the mid-20th century CE. From the early 8th century CE the military had its own separate set of examinations.

The rulers of the Sui Dynasty (581-618 CE), who had once again unified China, were keen to further improve and centralise the traditional administration system set up by the Han. There was now a much greater emphasis not on an officials’ family connections and their letters of recommendations from powerful friends but on the abilities demonstrated in their performance in civil service examinations held in the capital. These examinations combined elements from tests used in previous regimes such as questions on government and knowledge of the classics of Chinese literature, especially those on Confucianism.

Emperor Gaozu (r. 618-626 CE), founder of the Tang dynasty (618-906 CE) continued with the same policy and added further refinements such as testing a candidate’s speaking skills. The examinations themselves were now more sophisticated with both regularly held ones and special event exams to weed out the very best recruits. Now fully established, the civil service examinations tested a young man’s knowledge of the following:

  • writing and calligraphy
  • formal essay writing techniques
  • classic literature
  • mathematics
  • legal matters
  • government matters
  • poetry
  • clear and coherent speaking

Examinations were initially organised by the Board of Civil Office and thereafter by the Board of Rites, they were held annually, and they attracted up to 2,000 candidates. Extremely testing, only about 1% of examinees actually passed, although it was possible to retake the examinations an unlimited number of times. Those who passed then faced another examination at the Board of Civil Office.

During the Song dynasty (960-1279 CE) the examinations were restructured to meet greater demand - five times that seen during the Tang. Now a qualifying examination was imposed to select those candidates more likely to do well in the examinations proper.

There also began in this period certain measures to limit (but certainly not eliminate) corruption such as the introduction of anonymous marking, the use of a number instead of a candidate’s name to avoid bias, and, in the case of the second and third level exams, even the copying of handwriting by a clerk to disguise who had answered the papers.

As if the prize ticket of a place in the state apparatus were not enough of an inducement to candidates, there were other benefits, too. Successful candidates were allowed to wear certain robes which became status symbols in wider society, they were given certain tax benefits, and their new status meant they avoided corporal punishment for some criminal offences.

When the Mongols ruled China during the Yuan Dynasty (1276-1368 CE) the exams were first cancelled altogether and then reinstated but with quotas based on a candidate’s ethnicity - Han Chinese were only allowed 25% of the exam places. The civil service examination system was fully revived, though, in 1370 CE under the Ming dynasty (1368-1644 CE). Adding their own refinements to the traditional setup of previous Chinese dynasties, the Ming introduced a geographical quota system so that the richer regions did not, as was previously the case, dominate all the positions in the civil service. Meanwhile, the increase in the number of schools meant children with parents who could not afford private tuition could now, at least in some areas, receive the essential education necessary to prepare for the exams.

Under the Qing dynasty (1644-1911 CE) yet another layer of complication was added to the exam system. An examination for younger boys, which they had to pass in order to be eligible to take the level one regional civil service exam, was introduced. The Qing also added another level at the other end of this academic obstacle course. Now candidates who passed the level three palace exam had to do yet another written test, this time set by the emperor himself. The good news was that success in this final paper meant an immediate senior appointment.

Qing abolished the civil service exams system in 1905 CE. Its legacy remains, though, in the particularly high regard, indeed, almost reverence with which education is held in Chinese culture today.

Full article WHE

Megathreads and spaces to hang out:

reminders:

  • 💚 You nerds can join specific comms to see posts about all sorts of topics
  • 💙 Hexbear’s algorithm prioritizes comments over upbears
  • 💜 Sorting by new you nerd
  • 🌈 If you ever want to make your own megathread, you can reserve a spot here nerd
  • 🐶 Join the unofficial Hexbear-adjacent Mastodon instance toots.matapacos.dog

Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):

Aid:

Theory:

  • Mokey2 [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago
    Mokey listens post

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Everybody_Digs_Bill_Evans

    Bill Evans - piano Sam Jones - bass (tracks 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, & 8) Philly Joe Jones - drums (tracks 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, & 8)

    16 bar tune

    First Listen:

    I’m doing active listening as part of my practice, I really need to be doing this everyday if I want to get good.

    Song opens with some weird pseudo-latin thing, not sure what it is. Philly Joe jones is doing some weird machine gun thing on the hihat. Sam Jones is playing the same rhythm but it feels super syncopated because the bounce between notes.

    They hit the head and Philly accidentally? goes into a two feel. I like that PJJ made it seem like it was on purpose by ending the phrase. The switch between the two-feel and ride is seemless, no time is lost. Bill Evans is playing block chords, which is apparently when you put chords under the melody.

    I like Bill Evans is phrasing the melody, some parts are quieter than others.

    Solos:

    Bill evans first few choruses are just him playing with ideas.

    1:37 is when they start digging in.

    I love the ideas Bill Evans comes up with.

    Philly joe trades with bill, he starts playing some really simple quarter note ideas.

    Philly loves to smack the one at the beginning of his trading.

    On the third trade, he mutes the cymbals which seems like something he doesnt do often.

    I feel like this isn’t Phillys most impressive offering but that’s good because us mortals need something to transcribe.

    On the head out Philly is using the bass drum to match the melody.

    The pseudo-latin thing comes back in. I wonder what it’s supposed to be.

    Second Listen:

    The hi-hat barks seem to be on 1 and 4.

    I wonder if he played that two feel because what he was playing before? It logically makes sense.

    Press roll crescendo into the chorus, swaggers in some notes before playing time.

    I still feel like Philly Joe Jones ride beat feels like it’s accenting 1 and 3. Sometimes he’ll double up on the ride pattern beat.

    All good ride beats have a strong pulse, good flow and pushing ahead. I don’t think there are players who have a plodding or heavy beat and I think these attributes are useful when trying to learn other peoples ride cymbal sound.

    That second trading idea is so musical.

    I don’t like the ride cymbal mutes on the third.

    Fifth, ba boom ba boom ba boom ba boom.

    Seventh quote to the intro.

    I like Philly orchestration on the head, like he uses the open hi hat a lot.

    Third Listen:

    I didn’t know Philly Joe Jones was a tap dancer when he was a kid.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blues_for_Dracula

    His first album as a leader was this, what a guy.

    2:42 something happen where the time slighty drags, i wonder what happened.

    I’m going to get bored if I just do the same listening everyday, so I’m going to watch/listen to one of these everyday too. There’s a playlist of a hundred of these.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NxSYvDunaqc&list=PLak-t2MrBbPvCesE1Cp7t8O-TcIq-ujB4&index=12

    • GalaxyBrain [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’ve got a drummer friend who I think would love this kind of posting. I know it’s out of your wheelhouse but if i shot you a few punk songs with neat drumming would you be interested in giving a similar kind of review? When Punk started getting super fast it attracted a lot of jazz drummers who where just stoked to play a new kind of style and sometimes they were also the only people who could keep up until bears got a bit more standardized. Off the top of my head I’d love to hear what you think of Is This My World by Jerry’s Kids. It’s an album but a less than 20 minute one. I love your music posting but taste wise I think we’re really far apart and I wouldn’t mind seeing if there’s common ground