• Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    Profits shouldn’t exist. They should be required to put that money back into the company and take a salary for themselves. Idk how this works with shareholders but they can get fucked for all I care at this point.

    • psvrh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      1 day ago

      We used to have progressive income taxes that did this.

      Reagan, Thatcher and their ilk pulled them because “trickle down, a rising tide lifts all boats, thousand points of light, blah blah blah”

      • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        15 hours ago

        A rising tide lifts all boats has always struck me as a strange metaphor for them to use. To me that conjures up thoughts of welfare, UBI, irreducible minimums, safety nets, etc. It seems like a great metaphor for the opposite of what they’re using it for.

    • huquad@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      The way you fix this is with higher, and enforced, corporate taxes. If the corporation doesn’t keep the money anyways, they flow it back in.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Companies need shareholders to get off the ground, and you don’t have to be rich to be a shareholder. That’s the whole idea… otherwise only the mega rich have the capital to start businesses.

      Paying C-suites this much is just idiotic though. I own a few stocks, and seeing some of the companies pay executives and upper management so much to feud and slowly destroy companies makes me sick. It is not what anyone sane wants unless they’re parasitic daytraders or drinking the corporate kool-aid.

      Greedy capitalism is the problem, but it’s also a culture problem, I think.